In my opinion it would be unethical for an attorney to represent both the parents and the adult children because there is an actual conflict in their interests even if they say there isn't one.
The fact is, the three adult children without any children do not have the same responsibility for the care of their siblings as a parent does. If they were acting independently, or represented by objective independent counsel, their attorneys would say that they have their own lives (jobs, friends, etc.) and they were not closely monitoring Evanna's condition. And/or they were not in a position of power to do anything about it. An aunt or sibling does not have legal control over a child in the way that a parent does.
Parents are responsible for the health and wellbeing of their children, full stop. The best defense for every non-parent defendant is that they are NOT the parent! How is that not a conflict? An attorney cannot suggest that one of her clients testifies against another because it would prejudice one client's interest.
This is why conflict of interest rules exist. I'm glad the court is holding a hearing because it is a serious matter and strikes at the heart of competent legal representation.
I just saw one of their posts explaining why they have not had a funeral or memorial. They are waiting until the family is reunited, since the children would be very upset upon finding out they had missed Evanna's funeral.Yes, according to a February update on their now-removed *** fundraiser page.
Their attorney is far from being "famous." I would call him "experienced." He's been around for a long time. He does have a passion for civil rights, but he's also a criminal defense attorney. ImoSo, based on this do we expect the family to persist in having a single attorney because of their singular righteousness that requires (and IMO would be personally troubled by the absence of) all of its members to be in lock step with their perfect leader?
OR
... a post about how an evil county is dividing their family and that they now have to use court appointed attorneys while their parents use this famous Civil rights lawyer character ?
I doubt they run a B&B since there were 16 family members living in the home at the time of Evanna's death.Is this family operating a citizen-scientist, anti-macrobiotic, non vegan B&B of sorts? I'm very confused about the comings and goings of superfluous adults through the household. Do they have any registered businesses?
The homeschoolers I know teach according to their skills. One person might teach math and science and another parent might teach English and language arts. Sometimes there is only one person teaching on a regular basis and other adults teach classes only once in awhile.I would love to know who was in charge of teaching the children. We know now that Papa Steve developed their homeschool curriculum, but does he do the teaching too?
Actually they do run a business. They claim they do not, just as they claim not to be vegans or vegetarians or follow a macrobiotic diet.I doubt they run a B&B since there were 16 family members living in the home at the time of Evanna's death.
I haven't read that they own a business, but they did say they often cook and bake and sell food in the local co-op.
They seem to be similar to every home school community I've ever known. They all have shared views and opinions about public schooling, religion, vaccinations, synthetics foods, natural or holistic remedies, and "hands on," higher learning when it comes to educating their children.
I think that's what their attorney meant when he said they have an unconventional lifestyle.
Yeah, but it sounds more like they are self employed rather than having a business license or owning a company.Actually they do run a business. They claim they do not, just as they claim not to be vegans or vegetarians or follow a macrobiotic diet.
IMO one of the reasons they fought with with Tenji's mother over used furniture from the Kushi Institute when it closed in 2017 was because they wanted the furnishings for their own business.
The FB page clearly describes a school and shows photos of students learning about farming and nutrition. There are pics of Steve lecturing about macrobiotics and teaching Qigong. There are pics of Heidi and one of the sisters cooking "delicious" macrobiotic food.
I don't know why they lie and deny that they run a business and that the business is focused on a macrobiotic lifestyle. On their FB page they said they told the court they do not adhere to any kind of plant-based diet and in fact made a little joke about Steve testifying that he's been eating meat since 1961. That's not what their business FB page says:
House Of Macrobiotics
True, it's possible they host as a community service which means they wouldn't be subject to things like kitchen inspections and collecting sales tax. In my state we can host an event and ask for donations, which is legal as long as we say "suggested" or something similar. We host (or did before Covid) house concerts and ask for donations to pay the musicians. We don't take a cut of the proceeds and usually feed the band and put them up for the night.Yeah, but it sounds more like they are self employed rather than having a business license or owning a company.
Maybe they do, though. If so, it doesn't seem to be a very big one. Their FB page seems to be more about posting information rather than selling products to customers. Also, they can still teach classes or give lectures in Macrobiotics without owning a business. Imo
The whole post about Gomberg hearings was deleted.
They may have worn out their welcome with msm after accusing CBS Albany of *calumny* then turning around and complaining that the media won't interview them. IMO.IMO, the Gomberg hearings held yesterday did not go as planned by the "superior one"...and maybe the added members of the family will have their own attorney(s). Will be interesting to hear what happens in court today. Hopefully, someone other than the TB family circus will cover it
I don't know if anyone outside the family can report on court proceedings. In family court, all pleadings, recordings, transcripts, or other documents are confidential and not available to the public. Only the parties involved will have access to the court file. ImoIMO, the Gomberg hearings held yesterday did not go as planned by the "superior one"...and maybe the added members of the family will have their own attorney(s). Will be interesting to hear what happens in court today. Hopefully, someone other than the TB family circus will cover it
MANY of their posts have been removed IMO just today alone! They’ve also claimed to only know about today’s hearing an hour before- Yet they posted about the date previously~ Typical MOOThe whole post about Gomberg hearings was deleted.