Found Deceased NY - Jennifer Ramsaran, 36, Chenango County, 11 Dec 2012 - # 9

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves

New Posts

Status
Not open for further replies.
krey said:
Do you suspect her husband at all? Just curious.
Click to expand...

Have I considered the possibility, absolutely. When I was first told about Jen missing, it didn't cross my mind. As the months have gone on and I've seen all the comments and posts, I would have been blind to not have considered it.

I would really like a chance to answer this, and I will, but I have to wait until I can be verified.
 
God, I can't wait for an arrest. That's about all I got without getting myself banned for life and eternity.
 
LolaAngelina said:
BBM
Thanks Bear, couldn't agree more. Jen seems to get forgotten among all the other goings on.
Great to hear directly from Ernie Cutting on what is happening with the investigation as well.
Click to expand...

Please, do not think that because I have a different view point, that I have forgotten Jen. I want for Jen to have justice. I want her children to have closure and not grow up wondering.

However, I'm not going to declare someone guilty, without something more than a feeling.
 
Solus said:
Have I considered the possibility, absolutely. When I was first told about Jen missing, it didn't cross my mind. As the months have gone on and I've seen all the comments and posts, I would have been blind to not have considered it.

I would really like a chance to answer this, and I will, but I have to wait until I can be verified.
Click to expand...

Thank you, Solus. I look forward to hearing more.
 
Solus said:
Have I considered the possibility, absolutely. When I was first told about Jen missing, it didn't cross my mind. As the months have gone on and I've seen all the comments and posts, I would have been blind to not have considered it.

I would really like a chance to answer this, and I will, but I have to wait until I can be verified.
Click to expand...

Once you are verified, hope we don't hear that there is secret information that only certain people know that points to it not being GR.
 
Jilllian said:
It's not me.
And it was created while the original JFJR was down because of hacking.
Click to expand...

Jillian sooooooo glad your back you had us worried!!!! Also glad the page is back up and JRs pictures she painted are still there!! :rocker:
 
SouthAussie said:
Once you are verified, hope we don't hear that there is secret information that only certain people know that points to it not being GR.
Click to expand...

LOL. Unfortunately, I don't have any "secret" information. If I did, I wouldn't have hinted to know it. :what:
 
epiphany said:
BBM

Sure...but if I have the opportunity to speak to a reporter only 8 days after my close friend has disappeared, I'm going to seize that moment to present my close friend in only the most favorable light to the public.

OTOH, if I am close friends with a couple, but it is the spouse of the disappeared person who is one of my best friends...that might be a little different.
Click to expand...

Good point...I would say this presents more of a difficulty and it is my thought that this may be why not as many have publicly come forward since they had many joint friends. IMO
 
Solus said:
Have I considered the possibility, absolutely. When I was first told about Jen missing, it didn't cross my mind. As the months have gone on and I've seen all the comments and posts, I would have been blind to not have considered it.

I would really like a chance to answer this, and I will, but I have to wait until I can be verified.
Click to expand...

I am with you on this one too Solus!
 
Jilllian said:
It's not me.
And it was created while the original JFJR was down because of hacking.
Click to expand...

Wow that's no good Jillian. Glad to see the original page still has all the maps and timeline, very important to keep all that info out there.
I can't say enough how much I appreciate all the work you continue to do for Jennifer.:rocker:
 
Magiefeu said:
Solus said:
Have I considered the possibility, absolutely. When I was first told about Jen missing, it didn't cross my mind. As the months have gone on and I've seen all the comments and posts, I would have been blind to not have considered it.

I would really like a chance to answer this, and I will, but I have to wait until I can be verified.
Click to expand...

I am with you on this one too Solus!
Click to expand...

BBM - Just what are you with Magiefeu - that you have considered this possiblility? That you were blind to not consider it? <Mod Snip>
 
553152_486285581418152_2108901967_n.jpg


If only this beautiful lady could give us the answer ... what happened to you Jen?
 
Solus said:
When the first paragraph is read, then there is an assumption that the quoted comments were in regards to that first paragraph. When it is possible that they were regarding a different topic of conversation. I'm not suggesting the person regretted making the comments, but I am suggesting that context is not known.

I'm only trying to suggest that at this time the intention is unknown. Alot of the theories or comments revolve around the idea that there is an attempt by the "Anonymous Friend" to deceive or cast a shadow on the character of JR. This has been treated as a fact. You can't always solve a problem if your not clear on what is fact vs perception.
Click to expand...

OK, so the "anonymous family friend" first says that Jennifer was discussing the possibility of separating from her husband, and then in the next statement we read that she might have developed an emotional attachment to someone online who may have possibly led her astray.

Now...what possible OTHER context could either of those statements have been in? They both sound perfectly straightforward to me.

I don't necessarily attach what is meant by the 2nd statement (emotional attachment) to the first one.

If the first statement is true (that Jenn was discussing separating from her husband) -- that wouldn't necessarily have anything to do with the 2nd statement. She could have wanted to leave him because she'd found out about his affair, or for any of a number of reasons that have nothing to do with a romantic attachment with someone else.

However, it's odd that the only one person (this anonymous family friend) ever even mentioned that Jenn wanted to leave. Even her husband, who did acknoweldge marital problems, never said Jenn wanted to leave. In fact, he said the direct opposite -- "she would never leave." And there's evidence that Jenn was taking measures to save her marriage and keep her family together, so I think the first statement is quite suspect.

The 2nd statement -- about an emotional attachment to someone online -- is most likely blatantly false. As we have discussed before, there is no electronic trail or any other evidence that points to Jenn being involved in any sort of special relationship with any online friend.
 
LolaAngelina said:
Just in case anyone is confused, this is the original Justice for Jennifer page

http://www.facebook.com/pages/Justice-for-Jennifer-Ramsaran/485680108145366?fref=ts
Click to expand...

Thank you Lola. I have been very confused today.

I couldn't find the original one but saw that Lt. Cobb confirmed that they didn't remove the page.

I then a few hours later, saw a few new pages created with the same/similar name but none of the information was there. It looks like these were created in a copycat fashion.

Thanks for this one - now I know where to go!
 
LolaAngelina said:
Yes I would like to see just once someone who thinks GR is not guilty that is not a personal friend or involved personally in some way.
Someone that looked at just the facts etc and came to that conclusion.

Clearly that hasn't happened so far because that is not possible!
Click to expand...

I have to say that since I've been here - roughly December 12th, I have not come across one poster who wholeheartedly believes that Jennifer planned on leaving her family and then ended up on the side of the road dead.

Not one.

:banghead:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

DNASolves

Who is Fairfield County Jane Doe (1993)?

Members online

... and 159 more.
Total: 375 (members: 160, guests: 215)

Online statistics

Members online
160
Guests online
215
Total visitors
375
Totals may include hidden visitors.

Forum statistics

Threads
608,852
Messages
18,246,372
Members
234,467
Latest member
Aja777
Back
Top