NY - Karina Vetrano, 30, found murdered, Queens, 2 Aug 2016 #4

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
“We got to get this done,” said Vetrano’s father Philip Vetrano, a retired firefighter. “(The testing) just targets criminals — it’s one criminal related to another criminal, so it’s only targeting the bad guys.”

His wife Cathy Vetrano also demanded the tests be done.


http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york...testing-find-vetrano-killer-article-1.2903122


The latest development in the murder investigation came a few days after Vetrano's parents called for the New York State Commission on Forensic Science to allow familial DNA matching in New York, which lets police to search the state and federal DNA database to see if a suspect's relative is in the system.

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/02/05/police-catch-suspect-in-murder-nyc-jogger.html

http://www.dnaforensics.com/familialsearches.aspx

So are we to assume the suspect has a family member with a documented criminal background?
 
So are we to assume the suspect has a family member with a documented criminal background?

The suspect in this case was caught from his own DNA, not familial. That's what's been reported thus far. The person agreed to submit his own DNA and it was a match.

jmo
 
So are we to assume the suspect has a family member with a documented criminal background?
They didn't use familial dna on this case. They were petitioning for NY to allow it. Feb 10th they were going to vote on it. The suspect gave his DNA on his own.

Sent from my SM-J700T using Tapatalk
 
They didn't use familial dna on this case. They were petitioning for NY to allow it. Feb 10th they were going to vote on it. The suspect gave his DNA on his own.

Sent from my SM-J700T using Tapatalk

In the U.S., individual states have the option to pass their own familial searching laws. Four states – California, Colorado, New York and Florida have taken the lead in this area. So far, only Maryland has categorically banned familial searching.

http://www.dnaforensics.com/StatesAndFamilialSearches.aspx
 
In the U.S., individual states have the option to pass their own familial searching laws. Four states – California, Colorado, New York and Florida have taken the lead in this area. So far, only Maryland has categorically banned familial searching.

http://www.dnaforensics.com/StatesAndFamilialSearches.aspx
It is not allowed in NY yet (only partial, not familial), this is what the Vetranos are fighting for. I hope they continue, and I'm sure they will, even if suspect is already caught.
https://www.google.com/amp/www.nyda...ilial-dna-solve-nyc-murders-article-1.2956842


Sent from my SM-J700T using Tapatalk
 
Confirmed as Chanel Lewis. Will be arraigned later today or tomorrow per DA Brown.

Sent from my SM-J700T using Tapatalk
 
It's live here on local news since 11:30.

Sent from my SM-J700T using Tapatalk
 
Confirmed name: Chanel Lewis, 20 yo

Will be arraigned later today or perhaps, tomorrow

Made incriminating statements

Complaint available for you later in day
 
First spoke to him on Feb 2nd. Did not have him in question for months. Has a number of summons around that area.

Sent from my SM-J700T using Tapatalk
 
first spoke to him on Feb 2

we did not have him for months as has been reported

found 911 call that he was in HB

no criminal history, but # of summons around that area
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
147
Guests online
2,068
Total visitors
2,215

Forum statistics

Threads
601,574
Messages
18,126,341
Members
231,095
Latest member
cecilgoodroe
Back
Top