UnlicensedPI
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2018
- Messages
- 962
- Reaction score
- 5,288
Didn't her family OWN this apartment for YEARS??
From the complaint:IF they owned the property, why would they be suing apparent property managers?
"Upon information and belief, at all times relevant herein Defendant Rolling Realty, LLC was and still is the owner of the land, building and premises commonly known as 113 East 31st Street, New York, New York ("subject building")...
At all times relevant herein, Plaintiffs were, and still are, a long-term rent controlled tenant of apartment #2B in the subject building (the "subject premises")."
So the Defendant is the owner of the property and the Plaintiffs were renters.
Here is the complaint again: https://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/fb...cumentId=byxYl4YU5DMc0rajbX08Pg==&system=prod
It's reasonable to believe that she could have lost touch with her brother for one reason or another. I'm not seeing Gilda and Thomas referred to as married anywhere except once -- in the court docs she is referred to as his spouse by their attorney. I think this case is more unclaimed than unidentified, and it's likely she's categorized this way because they haven't located next of kin to make the official ID. She didn't have a driver's license and she'd been renting the same apartment (sublease, apparently) since 1968 -- I'm wondering if that's complicating the ID process because she doesn't really have any official documentation?