CuriousAmI
New Member
- Joined
- Jul 5, 2013
- Messages
- 307
- Reaction score
- 4
A comment IM made is bugging me. In talking about the car being processed by LE for 5 weeks she calls it "my car".
A comment IM made is bugging me. In talking about the car being processed by LE for 5 weeks she calls it "my car".
Welcome to WS...like you, I kind of feel he left on his own, my alternate scenario being he was in some sort of trouble and it caught up with him in a really bad way. If he left on his own, I still feel it was due to some problem, rather than a frivolous reason, such as an affair. Wish we knew for sure if the bike is really missing, or if he had it with him for sure.
hello. I have been reading all of your posts since RM went missing, but just joined. I believe RM left on his own, but I will feel awful if I later learn I am wrong, so I'm keeping an open mind and considering so many other scenarios. I joined this group only to mention a recent experience with a large mountain bike, and a small car. this past Tuesday by BF went for a long ride and ended at a party a few towns over. I met up with him after dark to provide a ride home. in order to fit the bike in the car he removed BOTH tires. this was done with no tools and took less than 2 mins, in the dark. when we arrived home he immediately put them back on, again, with no tools in the dark and in less than 2 mins. I believe RM took his bike that day. If he left on his own, perhaps the car was left at the station to make it appear he had taken the train, when really he rode his bike to meet his actual ride out. if not, then maybe he felt that being home early, with wife and kids out, he could take a quick ride, and had an accident. I just don't understand why he would start his ride at the station then.
Hi! And welcome to WS!! You're input is greatly appreciated!
The only problem I personally have with this theory is that IM specifically mentioned he would NEVER put the bike in his back seat. The car was his love, like another child, and wouldn't take the chance in damaging the interior. Otherwise, bike in the back seat makes total sense, hence the seat being pulled up.
I'm unsure about the bike thing and if it truly is relevant at all. IIRC, he wasn't an avid bike rider. At least not in the last year. Who's to say somewhere in there he didn't get rid of it and just never said anything about it. Or loaned it out. How often did she frequent the garage? This missing bike doesn't fit into the equation. The car was too small, it doesn't fit the timeline of events and it wouldn't make sense for him to take the bike in the car to the train that he didn't have a pass for. Just some thoughts.
You know, Curious, I read that as well and it struck me as odd also...it has always been "his" car, and now "my" car...just the change in pronoun stood out...:twocents: MOO and all that...
Agree - I'm with you. Leaving on his own, he'd be smart enough to have been stashing things away and leaving no tracks.
As for a reason, we don't really know much/anything about him...
To prove, LE has to really search.... maybe used a computer someplace where he wasn't known, had a fake account... Tricky since he appears to always have come home directly after work...
I mostly agree with what you are stating, except for the fact that if he loaned it out, his friend/relative, or whomever he gave it to would have come forward and said something by now.
But I do agree that the bike is a non factor. To go biking at 3pm on a friday of Father's Day weekend makes zero sense to me. He never told any one he was going out biking, there are tons of cars on the road, the kids should have been coming off the bus any minute, and his wife was expecting him home, etc.... it just doesnt fit.
He could have did it Sat or Sun morning when there was much more time to go out for a relaxing ride.
The thing that bugs me about RM's red car is that IM is sharing that LE is "still processing" and have not provided list of items found in car. It has been over a month! Seems to me a month is much longer than would be needed to process.Does LE still (emphasis on still) have RM's red car or has it been returned to family? Maybe someone in LE can clarify if this time frame is "normal" in a case like this.
I even wondered if the thing he sold at Arrow was a hard or Zip drive; or possibly a tablet or laptop.
I'm not sure why my post was deleted but I was trying to make a point that it doesn't appear that RM did anything that was his usual MO.
Peeps are saying that he never would put his bike in the back of the car. He also would never park his car at the train station. But his car was found there.
My point is that you can't base what happened that day on RM's usual actions because it doesn't appear, from the location of the car at least, that everything he did that day fit his usual behavior.
I wonder if LE even started processing his car yet. Doesn't sound like this case is a priority.
I mostly agree with what you are stating, except for the fact that if he loaned it out, his friend/relative, or whomever he gave it to would have come forward and said something by now.
But I do agree that the bike is a non factor. To go biking at 3pm on a friday of Father's Day weekend makes zero sense to me. He never told any one he was going out biking, there are tons of cars on the road, the kids should have been coming off the bus any minute, and his wife was expecting him home, etc.... it just doesnt fit.
He could have did it Sat or Sun morning when there was much more time to go out for a relaxing ride.
I'm not sure why my post was deleted but I was trying to make a point that it doesn't appear that RM did anything that was his usual MO.
Peeps are saying that he never would put his bike in the back of the car. He also would never park his car at the train station. But his car was found there.
My point is that you can't base what happened that day on RM's usual actions because it doesn't appear, from the location of the car at least, that everything he did that day fit his usual behavior.