DAILY TRIAL COVERAGE
DAY 5 – 9/14/23
- The judge noted for the record that Sydney Powell has requested to be excused from the courtroom. Powell agreed, and this marked this first time her voice was heard in the courtroom.
- Sydney’s former English teacher described her as a standout student and wrote a letter recommending her to the college where she ultimately failed.
- WATCH: English Teacher Describes Sydney Powell in High School
- Milligan taught Sydney for three years while she attended St. Vincents High School.
- Milligan described an incident in which Sydney, accompanied by a friend, came to her distressed and crying because she ‘could not see the numbers.’ The situation was resolved when a teacher agreed to give Sydney a test at another time. Milligan said that she did not report the incident to school officials and that she never observed mental health issues in Sydney that would have caused enough concern to contact her parents.
- Dr. Thomas Swale, a neuropsychologist, testified that Sydney was out of her mind and experiencing psychosis when she attacked her mother.
- Swale was asked to evaluate Powell in July of 2023 to determine whether she was insane at the time of the murder. After reviewing her medical records, Swale diagnosed Sydney with schizoaffective disorder bipolar type and opined that she was in an acute psychotic state at the time of the murder.
- Swale said that Sydney suffered schizophrenic symptoms until May 2020, and then for four months after that she experienced suicidal ideation. Sweale said that he administered a series of tests to rule out malingering and at an earlier evaluation in 2021 he ruled out epilepsy or neurological impairment as having caused the criminal conduct.
- Lack of motive for the attack on her mother helped persuade Swale that Sydney was insane and could not tell right from wrong at the time of the murder.
UPDATE: A judge has sentenced Sydney Powell to 15 years to life for the the fatal stabbing of her mother in the family's home.
www.courttv.com
It caught my attention that IMO at no time did the English teacher describe Sydney as a “standout” student. Everything she said I read as “unremarkable”. IMO she was choosing her words carefully. The teacher was vague in the extreme: Sydney was respected by staff, respectful of teachers, was conscientious about grades. That’s about it.
No mention of academic giftedness, leadership, or contributions to the community. No mention of AP’s.
Matters not one whit that the teacher recommended her. Everyone who goes to college has 3 recommendations from somewhere or other! I’ve written recommendations for students whom I liked and felt should have a shot; they are carefully worded. They could be super bland, if need be: I could give examples where the student surprised me, or how they’d improved over the course of the term, how they’d gone out of their way to come to office hours, how active they were in discussions… See how you can say positive things without making the student out to be smart, or compromising your integrity? The English teacher didn’t have anything to say that was even this reflective of Sydney’s capacity as a student, nor even as a likeable and mature young person.
FWIW a good admissions department at a college/university will read between the lines. They notice what’s NOT there. I also used to do recruiting, and you don’t even have to exert yourself much to catch the drift. From there, the candidate might qualify or be disqualified from consideration (there might also be non-academic desirable features).
What I did catch from the English teacher’s comments was that Sydney knew how to coopt others to take care of her. Viz the chemistry test (which the teacher and another student rescued her over) and the skiing lesson where Sydney skied into a tree (after soliciting the teacher’s individual help and while being taught, no less). At university, you can’t be coopting others to take care of you in academic matters: they will tell you how to take care of yourself and push you in this direction. This is EXACTLY what the Dean’s office was doing, and they provided all kinds of safety rails to facilitate this (IMO that university does a super duper job with this).
To me, Sydney’s history of wanting to be rescued (and/or infantilized) without stepping forward for herself points to where we are now. She’s very manipulatively and aggressively trying to step away from responsibility for an egregious act. And she has a whole cadre of familiars to make that happen.