MatthewTyler yeah, youre right that once hes out of the bar then there is a sea of possibilities, but lets face it some possibilities are more possible than others. He is more likely to get hit by a car than get abducted by aliens
Could you link to the post where this scenario was discussed, that he may have been abducted by aliens? Sounds interesting.
Were they legal or illegals?
![Stick Out Tongue :p :p]()
If no one on the other hand ever suggested it, there is obviously neither any reason to even bring the scenario up as a comparison, as it is then instead just a pointless strawman.
at least what I am suggesting makes more sense than one of those far-fetched secret world conspiracy theories that make Brian sound like a James Bond movie character.
Do you have a link to the post(s) where this scenaro was discussed that there may actually be a world conspiracy behind his disappearance?
I have never seen this possibility suggested by the authorities handling his case, only that he either may have left by his own, which is very common, or, two further more ominous theories they have not wanted to disclose, obviously because some of the theorizing to some extent involves Brian's friend Clint who have refused to cooperate with the investigators ever since the disappearance, something which immediately raised their suspicions.
Regarding the hit-by-a-car-and-hid-away-by-the-driver scenario, then, and apart from it actually quite often and repeatedly being suggested in missing person cases, there has however
as far as I have seen never been a 100% proven and publicized such case in real life. There may of course well be, I have just never seen one.
So if anyone have one, please feel free to post it.
Speaking of which, this scenario was likewise suggested in connection with the disappearance of Trevor Deely, but was refuted by two crime experts in a TV interview about the case with the explanation that there was no physical evidence proving such an incident. In other words, they meant that hit-by-car accidents always leaves
some form of traces in one form or another, traces which especially not a trained investigatory team or forensic team would miss.
Sorry to burst your bubble, people. Its real life, and stuff isnt so cool in here. My point is, with the sea of possibilities
the odds are
the real answer is typically the simplest, most logical answer.
Don't worry, you haven't burst anything, so no need to say you are sorry, either.
See, the problem with this as the most logical scenario in real life, is that in real life the actual and irrefutable proofs for it having happened in such a way as you suggest, has so far been very elusive, which consequently also makes the likelyhood of it as the most logical and most simple explanation more questionable.
This, as pointed out, does of course in no way mean it has never occurred, it may even occur repeatedly. It is just that it would help with a reference to such an
actually verified case (where someone have hit, and actually taken with them and actively hid a person) as supporting proof for this indeed being the most plausible answer to what happened.
Okay, to give you an example, there was a case long time ago. This one guy had died and his car was given to one of his nephews after his death. Disassembling some of the cars parts upon nephews request, the mechanic contacted police as some of the staining on the bottom part of the seat looked suspicious. Anyway, they did test the stain and it was blood. It ended up matching the DNA of a young man who had gun missing and then found dead with injuries consistent with being hit by a car. The man that originally had the car always took care of the car very well, he was a decent man by all accounts and there was absolutely nothing suspicious about him or his lifestyle. It was assumed that he ended up hitting this young man with his car and then getting him into his car and then leaving him/his body in the middle of nowhere. Sounds familiar? People are not what they seem and they dont do the right thing when pressured to act right. Its an imperfect world with many fallible people who do others wrong all the time.
P.S. I am not trying to convince you at all it is your call to believe whatever you want to believe.
Interesting. However given the wording "it was assumed", it was apparenty never conclusively proven, then? It would help greatly with name of the victim or of the suspect. When referring to case examples like this, one should namely always attach either name of the victim, perpetrator or other information for verification. Without such references, they could namely just as well be urban legends or even completely made up.
Again, I am not against the possibility, and it may be that it one day turns out this scenario really happened in Brian's case and despite the CCTV never recorded him leaving the bar in the first place, I am just saying that as long as there is no supporting actual evidence for it, it currently remains in the category of a personal theory as good as any other.
Its like if I claimed that Brian was put into an alien spacecraft. What?
Well, actually you did, as you were the one who brought up alien abduction in the first place
.:waitasec: