jk204
Inactive
- Joined
- May 28, 2016
- Messages
- 773
- Reaction score
- 3
Aren't they having monthly meetings with LE? I read that somewhereTo me THEY is the Rhoden family. Logically the info would have come from LE or Protective Services. MOO
Aren't they having monthly meetings with LE? I read that somewhereTo me THEY is the Rhoden family. Logically the info would have come from LE or Protective Services. MOO
Given the information provided in MSM, is it fair to assume that both Manley and Gilley families have requested custody of both children R and K?As far as I know, no one. I can't find one article that has a quote stating that anyone has visits w/the two babies. The two older children are each with their other bio parent.
To complete on the discoveries:I will also be devil's advocate and say that overall I find BJM's reaction on the discovery quite natural, genuine, not suspicious.
In particular, it would be ackward, if she had done wrong, to call her father - father of the victims.
IMO, if one had something to hide, there would be easier ways to deal with the discovery. Another reaction could have been to just call cops and say "the door is locked, no one is answering, I think there is something wrong".
I don't know where you live, but, it is not that way in my state, nor Ohio. The bio dad, in your friend's case, had obviously been proven to be the bio dad, or there would not have been a court order of support. They won't order men to pay support until it is proven that they are the bio dad. If they were married to the mother at the time of the birth of the child, then the court sees them as the bio dad. Otherwise, no, signing the birth cert., is not good enough anymore if one is unwed. I've watched this play out more than once, the state will not award benefits from a deceased father, nor make a father pay child support, who was/is not married to a mother, unless it can be proven, that they are the father.
https://www.ohiobar.org/forpublic/resources/lawyoucanuse/pages/lawyoucanuse-438.aspx
Sorry I was adding a link. Try the second one. What I'm getting at is the three execution style murders are all just off of 32.Not sure I understand what you're getting at. But I did read all of it and found the "future" of the highway section interesting.
The reason I included the Wikipedia link was because it had a overall nice visible line of how it goes through. Maybe it was a hit by "out- of- towners" that incorporated the help of locals. Say a future business partner. Or this specific line of business. Someone that wants to take over for the Rhoden's. Maybe those same "out- of- towners" were doing business with the other two locations as well. These all happened a few months apart from each other so they did a hit one run and continued on their way and then chilled out a while. Did another run and did another hit, so on. By the time the bodies were found they were a good 3 hours out of town. I stayed up all night so maybe I'm just looney from insomnia at this point who knows....Not sure I understand what you're getting at. But I did read all of it and found the "future" of the highway section interesting.
Given the information provided in MSM, is it fair to assume that both Manley and Gilley families have requested custody of both children R and K?
I will be devil's advocate here and say that it is quite possible I would have reacted the same way JM did when he discovered the bodies.
His sister just found her brother in law dead. He enters this home finds his second sister lying in the hallway. He expects the worst for his niece.
If one doesn't know how to provide care in this situation then one should leave it to paramedics after an immediate call to 911. Perhaps learning should be a good idea but that's another story.
As for the little voice crying, as long as she is crying, she is fine and can wait assistance. I would have only gone in there if I heard her choking.
I will also be devil's advocate and say that overall I find BJM's reaction on the discovery quite natural, genuine, not suspicious.
In particular, it would be ackward, if she had done wrong, to call her father - father of the victims.
IMO, if one had something to hide, there would be easier ways to deal with the discovery. Another reaction could have been to just call cops and say "the door is locked, no one is answering, I think there is something wrong".
I think you could right about the very last part. And someone was supposed to get paid.I don't think she did it, and I don't think she expected her family to be murdered. Now, wittingly, or unwittingly, could she have given info to the people who did commit the murders? I think so. I think she knows more than she's telling. I think DS does too.
I'm starting to wonder if we're talking about the same things. I was talking about SS benefits and glf brought up SS as well. Are you talking about paternity for child support payments? Or something altogether different. I'd hate to go in circles if we aren't talking the same subject.
I think you could right about the very last part. And someone was supposed to get paid.