Steelslady
Justice for Kelsey
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2013
- Messages
- 7,189
- Reaction score
- 62,717
No one is saying that. But you seemed to be implying that we shouldn't continue to theorize based on the possibility that he has dementia or the fact that she was dying of cancer.
I replied that I thought her cancer was a fact and that it's a pretty important nugget of information when the victim's own family suspects he has dementia.
That's it. It's like ping pong. You hit the ball, I hit it back. And on and on. No reason to get huffy and say, "Well I guess this case is solved, then."
Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk
But I expect us to play ping pong back and forth whenever we post- we've done this for a bit, but honestly, I enjoy it and have learned a lot from you- that's the truth. You also put the breaks on us when facts are confused with rumors- another quality I like and respect about you- that is needed here, always.
My frustration- not with you or anyone here, is that it is so easy to get "attached" to a person we suspect may have an illness because we have loved ones and friends that have the same and honestly, all of our stories are just heartbreaking to witness, and heartbreaking to read as well. I would rather that this be the same- that he loved his wife very much, wanted to make her last birthday a special one with him, and she died on the way. But until I see the evidence of this, my head keeps saying, there's more to it than this.
If I am wrong, I will definitely apologize and admit it, and trust me, I pray that I am wrong. I so want this to be a loving and happy ending (in his heart and head) to her life than something awful or sinister.
Yet, the cops using the FBI lab and the chief is getting upset with his numerous stories keeps me holding sympathy back.