skibaboo
Mrs Map
- Joined
- Oct 31, 2011
- Messages
- 10,704
- Reaction score
- 4,968
Thank you for bringing this to our attention atothem, and thank you for the link Foxfire
*off to listen*
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sorry for all these posts... But yea I never leave to walk/ bike anymore without my pepper spray even when it's broad daylight. It sucks because I like to bike to the river and sit and reflect and I can't even do that anymore because that's so vulnerable. Idk I just want to tell all of the woman I see out to be careful.
Sent from my VS990 using Tapatalk
If you're afraid and reclusive, the bad guys win. Just be aware, stay resilient and don't talk to strangers
You are absolutly right. Thank you.If you're afraid and reclusive, the bad guys win. Just be aware, stay resilient and don't talk to strangers
I feel safest with an equalizer, that can give lead poisoning. If you are trained to use it, I feel that's the best way to keep the bad guys from winning.
Bumpity bump.
Isn't it a shame that the public is being left in the dark in an investigation of this magnitude. Silence and jurisdictional linkage blindness is what enabled JDW to remain active and stealth for years or decades, and is a serial sexual predator/killer's most lethal weapon, imo..
Jurisdiction linkage blindness is a phrase coined by Dr Steven Egger in the 1970s.. There are only two investigative resources/tools that prevent or combat linkage blindness; an informed aware citizenry & FBI VICAP, imo.. The silent investigative strategy combined with linkage blindness has enabled many predators/serial killers to remain stealth for years or decades undetected while preying on unsuspecting innocent victims, imo..
Dr Steven Egger, associate professor of criminology at the University of Houston-Clear Lake, is a nationally recognized expert in serial murder <Linkage Blindness>
Dr. Egger says, serial killers continue to kill because some aspect of the murder fulfills a psychological need, either the way in which the murder was committed, or what was done with the body afterwards. Discovering the actual motive is never easy. "It's always a problem trying to figure out why these people do what they do," Egger said. Many had terrible childhoods and were sexually abused, but that is not always true. Not only is it difficult to figure out why serial killers continue to kill, it is also hard for law enforcement agencies to identify a serial killer due to "linkage blindness," another term coined by Egger.
"Police don't share information across jurisdictional boundaries," Egger said. "There's always some friction there." Agencies prefer to worry only about their own jurisdiction, instead of sharing information to work together to solve a murder. Egger says a serial murder investigation may, but not always, have as many as seven different crime scenes: the place the victim was initially lured, transportation to a different location, the place the victim was kept, transportation to another location, where the victim was killed, where the body was dumped, and where the weapon was dumped. "In most instances all the police have is the dumpsite," Egger said.
Egger says the other crime scenes are never investigated because of linkage blindness and the fact that law enforcement officials usually treat serial murder as a single homicide. "But if you find out that you're talking about multiple dumpsites in different jurisdictions, then you have a higher possibility of coming up with some trace evidence, particularly in the first kill," Egger said. "The offender brings something to the crime scene, leaves something at the crime scene, and takes something away from the crime scene," Egger said when explaining his three part premise of a crime scene and the reason there is not always a lot of trace evidence. "If you have someone who is aware of that, who is careful, and you're only dealing with one dumpsite, and you're treating it as a single homicide, you have no way of managing your suspects," Egger said.
Egger says a typical homicide is not difficult to solve because you are simply dealing with people's alibis, and the person without one becomes the prime suspect. However, in a serial murder you do not have that. "All crime is serial in nature," Egger said. "Most criminals, if not caught, will repeat their crime. And if that's true, then you've got to share information."
<sniped - read more>
http://prtl.uhcl.edu/portal/page/pct...?articleId=402
Excellent Post.
I cannot add much at all to this other than to say that I think there is another thing that can contribute to local LE not wanting to share with the public as well as not wanting to share with other jurisdictions or even the FBI.
This is JMO and does not apply to all LE. I hope it is an exception but I do feel that one of the reasons local LE likes to keep things under wraps can be summed up into "selfishness reasons" which can be broken down further into subparts like these
-wanting to be the department that "got their man" / wanting to be the hero in solving a major crime
(lots of evidence of this is the typical media interview after a major arrest where we see many officials giving each other accolades and patting themselves on the back.Some of these types of media interviews it seems more time was spent thanking everyone than telling us what led to the arrest and how it went down and if the public is safe now or not. Many movies have shown this too in portraying how one department selfishly wants to keep information about a case to themselves. )
-keeping their job security
(who's the wiser when a department says they need to hire two more investigators. Is that because they are really needed or could it be the current ones are lousy and don't work nearly enough on the cases as much as they should)
-hiding their lack of skills to be able to solve crimes
(are the current investigators really well trained? What was their background in getting the job they are in? Was it just a promotion of a street officer and now they are supposed to be a great detective with nothing more than street arrest skills and no extra training? What is their success rate at solving cases? etc. etc. How many times have we always said surely they must have searched the fingerprint database by now or they surely did X or did Y by now didnt they? And how many times I have wondered did the simple stuff even get done? )
There are others that fall into the "selfishness reason" category and this is just an example. LE people are just human like everyone else and so when we see similar type issues in other industries then surely it is within LE as well.
I am very concerned that FBI VICAP didn't alert LEAs in NW Ohio that a serial sexual predator/killer was active in their area due to the enormous number of missing/murdered young women over the past 3 decades
Maybe they did and LE just didn't notify US. That seems more likely. I can't remember where I read it but FBI was aware of a serial killer back then that was "working" the 80-90 turnpike exchange going all the way to Indiana. I sure don't recall anything like that being publicized.
Jashrema, it is very possible that LE knew and the community was simply left in the dark.. In the 2008 abduction/murder case that brought me to websleuths. A few days after the 62 year old serial killer's arrest, and the recovery of the victim. I decided to drive up to the Appalachian trail head where she was taken and view a memorial tribute that the thru hikers had made at the abduction site. I talked to a National Forest Park Ranger who told me that the serial killer had been on their radar for quite some time. I thought to myself, 'why wasn't the hikers aware of this'...
Upon arrival at the trail head parking lot I noticed warning posters on several of the trees; 'BEWARE of the BLACK BEAR'...
Black bear reported in Lucas County, Ohio
http://www.toledoblade.com/frontpage/2005/07/08/Black-bear-reported-in-Lucas-County.html