Tony1902
Hey na na...lagunas mentales
- Joined
- May 9, 2015
- Messages
- 983
- Reaction score
- 3,274
This is meant in no way to critique any post, but as an ethno-historian I always have a problem with 'racial' identification. As far as I understand it, IMO, educated, *advertiser censored* sapiens sapiens is NOT a ring species so I do not, have never was taught, to ever identify populations as 'race,' a specious concept for my professors. Others may differ. There are, and have been, ethnic differences, superficial typology difference. adaptations to climate, etc.
Hispanic has always meant, to me, my professors, and what I have gleaned from available literature, pre-DNA to be, at times, an admixture of Spanish, First Nation, & perhaps African ethnicity. It was never considered a race but there are boxes that must be checked. On that reasoning, Hispanic was considered New World admixture, whether mestizo, or for Canada, métis, although there are Latinos who consider themselves to be purely Spanish. Good luck with that, pureza de sangre was a long and arduous road when undertaken during those times.
Hispanic has always meant, to me, my professors, and what I have gleaned from available literature, pre-DNA to be, at times, an admixture of Spanish, First Nation, & perhaps African ethnicity. It was never considered a race but there are boxes that must be checked. On that reasoning, Hispanic was considered New World admixture, whether mestizo, or for Canada, métis, although there are Latinos who consider themselves to be purely Spanish. Good luck with that, pureza de sangre was a long and arduous road when undertaken during those times.