I noticed a few mistakes.
1. Dad did not normally leave the safe open. Anytime the door was open, the safe was always closed and locked.
2. He was not at the store at 9 am. The paper is mistaken. It was 10:30.
3. Yes my dad only wore button-up shirts. If they did not have 2 pockets, one on each side he would not buy them. Not all of his pockets buttoned closed, I am not sure about the shirt he had on, I know which one it was, but not if the pocket buttoned. We were not allowed toget them back, for obvoius reasons.
4. No he was not buying a red truck. He had a duelly, a Tahoe, a jeep, and trans am. I think the next vehicle he wanted was a black Hummer.
5. The thousands that the paper was alking about I think meant the moneyleft at the bar. He had went to get the bar ready to be opened, and check the jukebox and pool tables. That money remained there at the bar and was "overlooked" by the killers. So they either rushed in and missed it or they were not interested in taking it.
I do not really believe that someone killed him for nothing. Maybe I am in denial. If they robbed him, even though that is not okay, it is still "a reason". If they did not rob him then why kill him? I have heard that some people think it was 2 different crimes. I sure hope not. If we knew that it may be easier to find the killer. If it was 2 different crimes, then the killer would not even need to know where dad lived. So strange though, money was left in his shirt pocket and at the bar. So that was not robbery. But did they do that to throw people off that they were going after the larger amount of money, and to not look like a robbery they left the money on him and at the bar? Also I have never read anywhere where they found his cigarettes. They found his lighter and hat on the bar floor. He had money in his shirt pocket. But no cell phone, and no cigarettes. He always kept his cigarettes and lighter, phone and sometimes money or notes in his shirt pocket.
I hope they get the death penalty- quickly. I will be there.