Found Deceased OK, Veronica Butler 27 & Jilian Kelley 39, Vehicle Abandoned, Texas County, 30 Mar 2024 #6 *Arrests*

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
These five human beings, if one may call them that, are finally revealed to be what they are, cold-blooded murderers to a one. It matters not at all to me that only two did the killing. Every single one of these vile, stupid miscreants knew exactly what the intent was. It is beyond reprehensible. To think of the sustained cruelty here - days of planning, laying in wait, torturous murders, beers on a porch afterward - I can't. I just cannot.

It was my worst fear that the women suffered. Now we know they did. More than their five killers ever will.
 
SEP 12, 2024

ADAMS, TIFANY MACHEL - OSCN Case Details
09/05/2024TEXTSTATE'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S OBJECTION TO CIVIL FORFEITURE OF EVIDENCE AND ORDER FOR SALE OF EVIDENCE
Pursuant to 12 O.S. § 39, Document Available at Court Clerk's Office
09/09/2024TEXTMOTION FOR INDIVIDUAL, SEPARATE PRELIMINARY HEARING
Pursuant to 12 O.S. § 39, Document Available at Court Clerk's Office
09/09/2024TEXTSTATE'S BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF CONSOLIDATION FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING
Pursuant to 12 O.S. § 39, Document Available at Court Clerk's Office

CULLUM, TAD BERT - OSCN Case Details
09/05/2024TEXTSTATE'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S OBJECTION TO CIVIL FORFEITURE OF EVIDENCE AND ORDER FOR SALE OF EVIDENCE
Pursuant to 12 O.S. § 39, Document Available at Court Clerk's Office
09/05/2024TEXTSTATE'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR MEDICAL TREATMENT
Pursuant to 12 O.S. § 39, Document Available at Court Clerk's Office
09/09/2024TEXTSTATE'S BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF CONSOLIDATION FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING
Pursuant to 12 O.S. § 39, Document Available at Court Clerk's Office

TWOMBLY, COLE EARL - OSCN Case Details
09/05/2024TEXTSTATE'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S OBJECTION TO CIVIL FORFEITURE OF EVIDENCE AND ORDER FOR SALE OF EVIDENCE
Pursuant to 12 O.S. § 39, Document Available at Court Clerk's Office
09/09/2024TEXTSTATE'S BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF CONSOLIDATION FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING
Pursuant to 12 O.S. § 39, Document Available at Court Clerk's Office

TWOMBLY, CORA GAYLE - OSCN Case Details
09/05/2024TEXTSTATE'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S OBJECTION TO CIVIL FORFEITURE OF EVIDENCE AND ORDER FOR SALE OF EVIDENCE
Pursuant to 12 O.S. § 39, Document Available at Court Clerk's Office
09/09/2024TEXTDEFENDANT CORA TWOMBLY'S MOTION FOR SEPARATE PRELIMINARY HEARING AND BRIEF IN SUPPORT
Pursuant to 12 O.S. § 39, Document Available at Court Clerk's Office
09/09/2024TEXTSTATE'S BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF CONSOLIDATION FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING
Pursuant to 12 O.S. § 39, Document Available at Court Clerk's Office

GRICE, PAUL JEREMIAH - OSCN Case Details
09/05/2024TEXTSTATE'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S OBJECTION TO CIVIL FORFEITURE OF EVIDENCE AND ORDER FOR SALE OF EVIDENCE
Pursuant to 12 O.S. § 39, Document Available at Court Clerk's Office
09/09/2024TEXTSTATE'S BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF CONSOLIDATION FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING
Pursuant to 12 O.S. § 39, Document Available at Court Clerk's Office

The 6-page STATE'S BRIEF IN SUPPORT OFCONSOLIDATION FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING is linked in this article:
 
Last edited:
SEP 12, 2024

ADAMS, TIFANY MACHEL - OSCN Case Details
09/05/2024TEXTSTATE'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S OBJECTION TO CIVIL FORFEITURE OF EVIDENCE AND ORDER FOR SALE OF EVIDENCE
Pursuant to 12 O.S. § 39, Document Available at Court Clerk's Office
09/09/2024TEXTMOTION FOR INDIVIDUAL, SEPARATE PRELIMINARY HEARING
Pursuant to 12 O.S. § 39, Document Available at Court Clerk's Office
09/09/2024TEXTSTATE'S BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF CONSOLIDATION FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING
Pursuant to 12 O.S. § 39, Document Available at Court Clerk's Office

CULLUM, TAD BERT - OSCN Case Details
09/05/2024TEXTSTATE'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S OBJECTION TO CIVIL FORFEITURE OF EVIDENCE AND ORDER FOR SALE OF EVIDENCE
Pursuant to 12 O.S. § 39, Document Available at Court Clerk's Office
09/05/2024TEXTSTATE'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR MEDICAL TREATMENT
Pursuant to 12 O.S. § 39, Document Available at Court Clerk's Office
09/09/2024TEXTSTATE'S BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF CONSOLIDATION FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING
Pursuant to 12 O.S. § 39, Document Available at Court Clerk's Office

TWOMBLY, COLE EARL - OSCN Case Details
09/05/2024TEXTSTATE'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S OBJECTION TO CIVIL FORFEITURE OF EVIDENCE AND ORDER FOR SALE OF EVIDENCE
Pursuant to 12 O.S. § 39, Document Available at Court Clerk's Office
09/09/2024TEXTSTATE'S BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF CONSOLIDATION FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING
Pursuant to 12 O.S. § 39, Document Available at Court Clerk's Office

TWOMBLY, CORA GAYLE - OSCN Case Details
09/05/2024TEXTSTATE'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S OBJECTION TO CIVIL FORFEITURE OF EVIDENCE AND ORDER FOR SALE OF EVIDENCE
Pursuant to 12 O.S. § 39, Document Available at Court Clerk's Office
09/09/2024TEXTDEFENDANT CORA TWOMBLY'S MOTION FOR SEPARATE PRELIMINARY HEARING AND BRIEF IN SUPPORT
Pursuant to 12 O.S. § 39, Document Available at Court Clerk's Office
09/09/2024TEXTSTATE'S BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF CONSOLIDATION FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING
Pursuant to 12 O.S. § 39, Document Available at Court Clerk's Office

GRICE, PAUL JEREMIAH - OSCN Case Details
09/05/2024TEXTSTATE'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S OBJECTION TO CIVIL FORFEITURE OF EVIDENCE AND ORDER FOR SALE OF EVIDENCE
Pursuant to 12 O.S. § 39, Document Available at Court Clerk's Office
09/09/2024TEXTSTATE'S BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF CONSOLIDATION FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING
Pursuant to 12 O.S. § 39, Document Available at Court Clerk's Office

The 6-page STATE'S BRIEF IN SUPPORT OFCONSOLIDATION FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING is linked in this article:

Very interesting -- I definitely expected TC's attorney (About — Joi E. Miskel Law) would have been the first defense Motion for Separate Prelim Hearing but instead it was TA and Cora T.
 
Sad that Adams hated Butler so much that she would have her killed. Neither of the women deserved this, but I cannot understand why they did it when Butler was with Kelley. Two women senselessly murdered, and seems their only beef with Kelley was she was sent to accompany Butler.

jmo
Blinded by hate. That's the only explanation why they would kill one person and kill the uninvolved person with her too.

jmo
 
Blinded by hate. That's the only explanation why they would kill one person and kill the uninvolved person with her too.

jmo
But that doesn't explain all the other people involved. How does anyone sit around and listen to a plan like this long enough to become involved? Why did someone not shut down the "killing" talk when it was first mentioned? If TA was so influential or powerful they weren't comfortable shouting her down why not walk away? or why show up for the planning meetings? It is beyond my comprehension how a person allows another person in their presence long enough to wind up involved with a group like this.
ETA -- perhaps some children/youth who have to live in neighborhoods with kids in gangs could not get away or stay away without being hurt or killed themselves. But in the instance of this Oklahoma murder, the only possibility I see of someone unable to say "no" might have been Cora.
 
Last edited:
But that doesn't explain all the other people involved. How does anyone sit around and listen to a plan like this long enough to become involved? Why did someone not shut down the "killing" talk when it was first mentioned? If TA was so influential or powerful they weren't comfortable shouting her down why not walk away? or why show up for the planning meetings? It is beyond my comprehension how a person allows another person in their presence long enough to wind up involved with a group like this.
I agree, it is hard to wrap one's mind around the involvement of the others. Tifany clearly hated Butler. But the others who joined in this premediated conspiracy to commit a double murder, I will never understand that motivation. Particularly Grice, who, as we suspected, was the one who physically murdered Veronica.

The document, obtained by KSN, states that Grice stabbed Ms Butler to death and cut his hand badly in the process.
 
But that doesn't explain all the other people involved. How does anyone sit around and listen to a plan like this long enough to become involved? Why did someone not shut down the "killing" talk when it was first mentioned? If TA was so influential or powerful they weren't comfortable shouting her down why not walk away? or why show up for the planning meetings? It is beyond my comprehension how a person allows another person in their presence long enough to wind up involved with a group like this.
ETA -- perhaps some children/youth who have to live in neighborhoods with kids in gangs could not get away or stay away without being hurt or killed themselves. But in the instance of this Oklahoma murder, the only possibility I see of someone unable to say "no" might have been Cora.
Blinded by hate covers them all, imo. When you believe hateful things told to you by others (like TA) and see the world through hate, it blinds you. Hate is horrible.

jmo
 
Sad that Adams hated Butler so much that she would have her killed. Neither of the women deserved this, but I cannot understand why they did it when Butler was with Kelley. Two women senselessly murdered, and seems their only beef with Kelley was she was sent to accompany Butler.

jmo
Well stated @steeltowngirl …… and yes difficult to fathom or understand.

As it seems TA so despised, hated, or disliked VB…… one has to wonder what she thinks now when she looks in a mirror. And for that matter her accomplices as well. Just SMH at the depravity. MOO
 
Well stated @steeltowngirl …… and yes difficult to fathom or understand.

As it seems TA so despised, hated, or disliked VB…… one has to wonder what she thinks now when she looks in a mirror. And for that matter her accomplices as well. Just SMH at the depravity. MOO
I suspect TV feels like her "sacrifice" was worth it. Just a hunch.

jmo
 
TA and the members of God’s Misfits thinking their hate was enough to justify murdering VB and JK is audacious. It doesn’t matter if they hate VB or not, they still had to respect VB’s and JK’s right to live and be safe. They still had to respect VB’s rights to fight for unification and time with her children and the court mandates. They still had to respect JK’a role in supervising the visits whether they like with them or not. They still had to respect both women’s right to return home safe and sound without harassment, violence or threats from those that oppose them.

They said they committed these horrific crimes to protect TA’s grandkids when they caused irreversible and devastating harm to both them and JK’s children as well. God’s Misfits are not God. They can never bring VB and JK back. How do they expect children to react when they learn that a beloved parent is gone? How will they react when they are older and learn of the brutal way their own flesh and blood was murdered and discarded by those who can neither respect them or the law? TA treated her grandkids like property by dehumanizing their needs, now and in the future, to prioritize her ego’s need for power, control and submission. Yet somehow, despite her mentality and actions, she thought she knew better than the court and VB about who was a better fit to be a caregiver.

TA and her co-conspirators had a choice but it seems they got high off their own sense of self-righteousness, power and group identity. Rather than cope with their hate and find the least drastic and damaging solutions for TA to share custody with VB thereby fostering a healthy relationship long-term benefits for everyone involved, including JK, they chose to organize the vicious murders of two women and cause surmountable suffering and trauma to their families, children, loved ones and communities.

Funny though how they felt like they were in the right to commit these murders but yet didn’t want to be held accountable or answer for what they had done in court. If they think they did nothing wrong then why not be upfront about what they had done? Why not show the court the same pride they showed Cora’s daughter after the day of? Why hide the evidence if you don’t have anything to be ashamed of? I guess a part of themselves recognized that for all the power and control they thought they held as Sovereign Citizens who could unabashedly resorted to violence to supposedly protect their interests, they didn’t have enough of it to get the OBI off them, to avoid time in prison or to not be made face the public and the victim’s family members and representatives in court.
 
Blinded by hate. That's the only explanation why they would kill one person and kill the uninvolved person with her too.

jmo
We do have an idea of how TA and Cora's minds think -- they seemed to believe in guilt by association as Cora defended the murder of JK, the court approved visitation monitor, to her daughter that she was not so innocent because she was willing to help VB! JMO
 
But that doesn't explain all the other people involved. How does anyone sit around and listen to a plan like this long enough to become involved? Why did someone not shut down the "killing" talk when it was first mentioned? If TA was so influential or powerful they weren't comfortable shouting her down why not walk away? or why show up for the planning meetings? It is beyond my comprehension how a person allows another person in their presence long enough to wind up involved with a group like this.
ETA -- perhaps some children/youth who have to live in neighborhoods with kids in gangs could not get away or stay away without being hurt or killed themselves. But in the instance of this Oklahoma murder, the only possibility I see of someone unable to say "no" might have been Cora.

And don't forget that these horrible people made at least one previous attempt to kill VB. (The anvil off the truck plan.) So they were in it for awhile & seemingly all on board to murder VB & anyone else they wanted to.

Here's some of the thinking...
The daughter asked about Kelley and questioned why she had to die, “and was told by Cora that she wasn’t innocent either, as she had supported Butler.”

As has been said, they were blinded by hate, probably drunk off their own "power" too, imo.
 
have not read this case before.... did this start as a child custody dispute?
 

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
169
Guests online
3,371
Total visitors
3,540

Forum statistics

Threads
604,234
Messages
18,169,294
Members
232,168
Latest member
Beermuda
Back
Top