Lilibet
Southern Oregon
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2013
- Messages
- 19,663
- Reaction score
- 82,338
If they are so sure that Ames knows where the body is, and he is responsible for her death, It has to be one way for forcing Ames to talk...
If Ames is guilty of Stephanie' s murder, probably he can do it again, he can kill another woman, he can be dangerous for another people, it is not possible at all to do anything about it?
Welcome Rosa! I overlooked your first post here a few months ago. Thanks for coming back.
To answer your questions...
Its important for all of us to know that no one is ever required to talk to law enforcement officials. Even though that is inconvenient for LE trying to solve a crime, and frustrating for victims, it isnt legal for them to force anyone to talk. We all have the right to remain silent. If we have committed a crime, we are not required to help LE solve it.
The only way to prevent Ames from killing someone else is to convict him of killing Stephanie and lock him up. He is innocent until proven guilty, so even though the evidence points to him, it hasnt been proven in court. And even though that provides other opportunities for him to harm someone else, the justice system isnt designed to prevent potential future crimes.
So, although these fundamental rights allow a potential killer to walk among us, taking away those rights gives the government absolute power over individuals accused of a crime. I dont think we want that, since any of us could end up tortured for a confession and locked up for something we didnt do based on a false accusation. As it is, that sometimes happens despite laws protecting individual rights. In order for all of us to benefit from those rights, people like Ames have to benefit too.
And so we wait...51 months as of October 4.