Sorry, just caught up after being away all day... it was awesome to get away from the horror a bit!
I think the call might have been made by Whitney to Starbucks...a call for help. (Yes, that early.) I also believe that could have prompted the angry tossing of the phone into the lake.
With all due respect, I think you are clutching at straws. For whatever reason, you seem to be equating Clint with a Scott Peterson sort of character. The funny thing is, Clint wasn't doing anything suspicious. Not a single thing out of the ordinary. Holt
was. I simply do not understand if you are doing this to be provocative or what? Unlike all the hinky stuff pulled by Scott Peterson and others, there simply isn't any of that here. It is starting to feel really frustrating to read these baseless accusations. If there's evidence there, I mean, bona fide evidence, then by all means, share ... or better yet, contact Gresham PD!
I so hope not, of course! I keep worrying there were/are others but then I also keep thinking he was so apparently careless or stupid in terms of leaving evidence all over the place, it seems like he'd have been caught before now.
Maybe he's assaulted before but this assault got "out of hand" and it's the first time he went so far as killing someone?
I'm thinking, if it turns out that something bad did occur last August, that it was rape or attempted rape/attempted kidnapping. It may have happened in Washington, or it may have been a woman who was quite marginalized... maybe he abused or raped a prostitute.
It would have had her fingerprints on it.
Nothing in that report states that her fingerprints
weren't on it... only that his
were. Like other people stated, a lot of people carry bottles of Febreeze or like products in their car to freshen them up... especially now in the icky, damp, musty rainy season.
He could have grabbed it to clean something up because it was the only liquid he had. He could also have grabbed it to spray it in the air because blood smells awful... have you ever had the misfortune of visiting a butcher shop or a slaughterhouse? Or even had a relative dress a deer? It smells horrid, and he was stuck driving around in that car for at least a couple of hours with blood everywhere. Blech. It actually makes me nauseated just thinking about it.
If he dumped the gun in the bushes it wasn't because he was inherently stupid. He graduated with a 3.35 gpa, and that was even higher in junior high--over 3.6 if I recall correctly. People can make unwise choices in life, but the fact is...your intelligence remains fairly stable. One might lose reason due to extreme mental illness (psychosis) and behave irrationally, but basic IQ remains the same. It remains the same even if one is emotionally distressed or depressed. (In fact, depression is statistically more common in highly intelligent people; they have more conflict because they take in more, weigh more, but that's another topic...)
Re the license: If the removal of the license plate was for the purpose of delaying ID of the car, then why did he remove the front one?
<snipped by me>
One nation, under God, with liberty and JUSTICE for all. Did you know that a person can't be convicted on their confession alone? The evidence still has to support their confession. And now that JH (finally) has a lawyer, it sounds like maybe the lawyer isn't so convinced either. Last I read, the plea was 'not guilty.' (Any corrections on that out there?)
BBM and snipped by me.
First, there's a huge problem in Oregon with grade inflation. It is not a difficult thing to graduate with a 3.35 GPA; that's a B-average. Heck, even state colleges and universities are infamous for inflated grades.
Second, there is no way at all that J.H. is psychotic. Absolutely not. Have you ever been around someone in the midst of a psychotic episode? It looks nothing like his behavior thus far. I know that we had this discussion earlier, when I stated that schizophrenics and people suffering from psychotic illness
typically aren't violent towards others. We both agreed that yes, sometimes people who are psychotic can commit violence. Of course they can, and they do. Nevertheless, I beg you to learn a bit more about what happens during a psychotic episode. His attempts to cover his crime were disorganized and, arguably, stupid. But don't mistake his disorganization for psychotic disorganization... trust me in that psychosis looks very different.
I think it is more apt that his disorganization is simply a reflection of him being angry at himself. Look at his statements to police... he repeated so many times that his marriage was a mess and he was worried about losing his wife and his job. I think he had been struggling for a long time about his many issues and the way those contradicted the way he was trying to live his life. He repeatedly stated how he kept screwing up at work and his wife felt like he had "abandoned" her. I imagine that their sex life was a mess... if they had one at all, due to his *advertiser censored* addiction. I also say this from experience, though, thank God, the person I was with was not into kiddie *advertiser censored*. Rather, he was into "pee" *advertiser censored*. I didn't know it for a long time and had the misfortune of opening his computer one day to use his CD-ROM drive because mine had broken. When Windows Media Player opened, it started playing a pornographic movie... so then of course I went snooping. I found that this guy had been literally watching *advertiser censored* from the instant I left the house in the morning until late afternoon... quitting just in time for me to come home. Then he would do it again at night... there were a few times I fell asleep while we were watching a movie and I would wake up and catch him masturbating... with his laptop open. Our sex life was virtually nonexistent, and when he decided he felt like he wanted to be intimate, he always made bizarre requests of me... one time even asking me to pretend I was a prostitute and he wanted to pick me up on the corner of our street.
I really feel like that experience, and the way my guy acted, the way he would shove me away a good 75% of the time and then be clingy, jealous and possessive the rest of the time, knowing that he watched *advertiser censored* all day while I was at work and even when he was supposed to be working, etc. etc., I feel like JH is/was the same sort of guy. The fellow that was in my life walked around with a great deal of guilt. He felt like he was a freak, and I believe, he truly felt badly when he would say and do things that made me feel awful... but his fleeting moments of empathy couldn't fix the pathology that was in his mind.
Finally, regarding the license plate: it is not illegal to have only one license plate on your car in Oregon. The catch is, you had to have been issued only one. I often see cars driving around with only one license plate, particularly BMWs, Mercedes-Benz and Audis. Sometimes, in fact, people have a European license plate placed OVER their front Oregon plate... dunno why, but I've seen it a lot.
So simply not having a front license plate would not alert an officer to pull someone over as long as that person were driving appropriately and not breaking any traffic rules. Here is what the law states (BBM):
If only one license plate is issued, it must be displayed on the rear of the vehicle. If two plates are issued, one must be displayed on the front of the vehicle and the other on the rear of the vehicle. Plates must be in plain view so as to be easily read by the public and law enforcement (See ORS 803.540).
ETA: one more thing re: pleading guilty. As a former paralegal, I can assure you that not a single defense attorney out there will let a felony case plea "guilty"... NEVER.
EVEN IF THEY ARE INTENDING TO WORK OUT A PLEA DEAL. They always plea not guilty as a matter of procedure, and the deal-making goes on behind the scenes. If/when they work a deal, the plea is changed to "guilty" at the time the plea deal is presented to the court and accepted by the judge.