But thats an irrelevance simply because it does not impact in any way on the reasoning the SCA used to find count 1 in favour of the state. This was decided because Masipa misdirected herself in evaluating DE which the SCA subsequently found to be proven. All done without any reference to Pistorius being fearful or not.
The SCA can muse all it likes about his state of mind and whether or not they agree with the trial judge just as long as any disagreement with the facts as found by the original court are not used in determining the outcome of any elements of the appeal.
Its all a Hail Mary anyway
Roux tries to equate "fear" with lack of knowledge of unlawfulness but that is not correct.
On the defence's own case, OP, a trained firearms expert, knew he was not entitled to shoot in those circumstances