Again there is no proof that she used her mother's passport. It's only a vague suggestion by the mother's lawyer. What do you think the chances are of a TSA agent allowing a 16 year old girl to fly with the passport of a 40 year old woman? :thinking:
Kaboom,
You do bring up a valid point that does deserve an answer. The reason that I belive that it is posible that AY used her mother's passport is from my own personal experience. My wife is Asian and she immigrated to the US just before we got married. We have a young daughter now. My wife still has her old passport from her home country. Her picture was taken years ago, but as I watch my daughter grow up, I can see her looking more like my wife back then. I believe that AY was able to use her mother's passport because it was the Chinese one she use to immigrate to the US with when she was a lot younger.
If this is true, then not only did American Airlines /TSA allow her to board with her mother's passport, it was also an expired one.
Regards.
It could even have been an old U.S. Passport - they are good for 10 years. BUT - TSA should be checking the picture AND the date of birth printed on the passport. And there is no way that child could pass for a woman her mother's age. IMHO.
:cow:
According to the Criminal Complaint posted by GraceG, it was only AY's personal documents taken from the house.
Yeah - saw that , hence my post. I would rather go by the affidavit wording, for now, but thanks for clarifying the situation.I think at this point, we are all waiting for the Preliminary Hearing scheduled for 4/25/18 @ 10:30am. But you are correct, the affidavit does only show that AYs documents were taken. But if you trace back the posts a little further, you will see a lot of back and forth on this issue for various reasons.
Regards,
Yeah - saw that , hence my post. I would rather go by the affidavit wording, for now, but thanks for clarifying the situation.
If she went voluntarily on her own passport and she is over 16, what is the offence? Is it because she is under 18 and did not have parental permission?
Eg. Here in UK you need parental permission to marry between 16-18 but if you elope to Gretna Green, just over the Scottish Border, you can marry at 16 without parental permission. I know in this case he was already married but if he wasn't, could they have got married in Mexico?
So nothing happened in the apartment or she didn't talkNot much new info, but, as mentioned he waived his preliminary trial and there are now additional charges:
"The new charges include concealment of the whereabouts of a child, a third-degree felony, and corruption of minors, a first-degree misdemeanor, and stem from his taking Yu out of the country, authorities said Tuesday. After fully examining all the evidence we reached the conclusion that these three charges cover his actions, Assistant District Attorney Matt Falk said."
http://www.mcall.com/news/breaking/mc-nws-kevin-esterly-hearing-felony-charges-20180401-story.html
Kevin Esterly waived his hearing Tuesday on charges of interference with custody of children, concealment of the whereabouts of a child and corruption of minors. The case now heads to Lehigh County Court.
Easterly is also scheduled to have a summary trial Tuesday afternoon on a harassment charge related to a separate incident Feb. 10 with his now-estranged wife.
http://www.lehighvalleylive.com/allentown/index.ssf/2018/04/kevin_esterly_man_faces_trial.html
So nothing happened in the apprtSo nothing happened in the apartment or she didn't talk
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using Tapatalk
Hope this isn't dropped too
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using Tapatalk
Anybody know the statute of limitations if down the road a victim realizes they were in fact a victim and decides to pursue their predator?
Anybody know the statute of limitations if down the road a victim realizes they were in fact a victim and decides to pursue their predator?
Excellent info, thank you!
I didn't have time to research.
"In PA, the age of consent is 16, while a minor is considered anyone under the age of 18. This leaves a confusing gray area that allows for legally consensual sex to result in charges."​
Or in this case no charges? Sounds like it's past due to review the legalities of this gray area.