PA - Assassination attempt, shooting injures former POTUS Donald Trump, leaves 1 spectator deceased two in critical condition, 13 July 2024 #4

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Maybe the election process in the US needs to be changed. To put all candidates on a level playing field. Maybe a potential candidate shouldn't be allowed to campaign from the day they were inaugurated. That puts a tremendous strain on all aspects of the government; from providing security for the candidate to vetting the locations, using local LE personnel who provide additional security.

According to this article, wealthy candidates can always provide their own security and pay for it out of their own pocket or use campaign funds for security details. Even regular-Joe congressmen and women have to make a personal decision on how to protect themselves from wingnuts yet without being provided regular security. The number of threats that SS deal with every year aren't limited to presidential candidates - they run from Supreme Court judges, congressmen and women, senators and private citizens like Paul Pelosi (although Nancy's personal detail followed her and no one was protecting her husband). So there's another lapse in security. Trump is the first former president to actually run again so he presented a much different circumstance than let's say, Jimmy Carter or George W H Bush. I believe that difference is why there was a lapse in security. I doubt it will happen again.



In Canada where I live there is a limit to when a candidate can start campaigning. Once the election is called usually between 37 to 51 days the candidates can start campaigning. Some drop out because they don't have the funding (usually the fringe type candidates). Here's a chart that shows the differences in voting.


$3 billion and the US SS can't prevent ants from a picnic. I don't think changing/re-writing laws will help. :(
 
$3 billion and the US SS can't prevent ants from a picnic. I don't think changing/re-writing laws will help. :(
There was one point in the hearings where some politician asked if the SS needed more money and it would be appropriated. It may have been Ted Cruz who asked (shame on him, if so) but I was disgusted. Washington's (and all governments) answer to everything is always throwing more money at it. This when the US has a 35 trillion dollar national debt!!! https://www.usdebtclock.org/
 
Snipped.

The job of a special agent is highly competitive, and only 2% of our applicants make it through the hiring process. From the moment I became Director, I have been focused on resourcing our personnel, obtaining technology, increasing staffing levels, and evaluating our hiring processes and training facilities. I am proud that this year we had a net gain of over 200 special agents.

 
Snipped.

The job of a special agent is highly competitive, and only 2% of our applicants make it through the hiring process. From the moment I became Director, I have been focused on resourcing our personnel, obtaining technology, increasing staffing levels, and evaluating our hiring processes and training facilities. I am proud that this year we had a net gain of over 200 special agents.

Whoopdeedoo. Maybe they should look at that 1000 yard shooting radius thingy.
 
Snipped.

The job of a special agent is highly competitive, and only 2% of our applicants make it through the hiring process. From the moment I became Director, I have been focused on resourcing our personnel, obtaining technology, increasing staffing levels, and evaluating our hiring processes and training facilities. I am proud that this year we had a net gain of over 200 special agents.


Not buying it.
 
There was one point in the hearings where some politician asked if the SS needed more money and it would be appropriated. It may have been Ted Cruz who asked (shame on him, if so) but I was disgusted. Washington's (and all governments) answer to everything is always throwing more money at it. This when the US has a 35 trillion dollar national debt!!! https://www.usdebtclock.org/
Senator Lindsey Graham... Repeatedly asked what do you need to have joint communication system? Do you need more for protection detail?
Moo ... Judicial/Homeland Security Congressional Committee hearing
 
Senator Lindsey Graham... Repeatedly asked what do you need to have joint communication system? Do you need more for protection detail?
Moo ... Judicial/Homeland Security Congressional Committee hearing

This whole issue of communication among law enforcement entities at major events and during major crises just really makes me angry. This has been discussed for years now, and it still seems like little progress has been made.

In 2007, after the Virginia Tech campus shooting that killed 33 people, task forces were formed in states across the country to address campus safety and issues that we learned from the Virginia Tech mass shooting. At the time, I was working at a university in Ohio and was appointed to represent our university on the Governor's Task Force on Campus Safety that was established immediately after the Virginia Tech incident. We had many statewide meetings, including meetings with leaders from Virginia Tech's campus security team. One of the things that came up at these meetings, over and over again, was the need for improved and coordinated communication abilities among different law enforcement agencies. That was in 2007. It is now 2024. And the SS are still having this problem? Seventeen (17) years ago the communications problem among various LE entities in crisis events was highlighted as needing to be resolved. I find it amazing that it is still a problem among SS and state LE and local LE. It should be obvious and a no-brainer that this is critical - one of the most critical issues - for law enforcement in a crisis situation that they plan for when providing protection for our presidents and other VIP leaders.
 
Last edited:
SECOND SECURITY BREACH
***WITHIN 18 DAYS***
TBM
The Secret Service said in a statement to The Post Monday night the two were “credentialed and screened,” but were removed from the premises because they didn’t follow proper entry protocol.
....After the two people were tracked down, they were ejected from the event and questioned, sources said. Neither person has been criminally charged.

The two did get stopped at an initial checkpoint before they bypassed the second screening, sources said.
From the article:

"The GOP nominee was set to give the keynote address, but was instructed by his security detail to wait until the individuals were located, according to sources."

MOO: while this does bring questions about how a person could circumvent the "Second Screening", it feels much more like business as usual for the Secret Service. A couple folks dodged a line up, somehow; and they were identified, detained and escorted out... before Trump took the podium. I would think something similar happens every other week....So if Butler had not focused so much attention on the SS, this would have made the MSM...NOT.

So to the extent the second ring was porous: this was a "breach". Its a little harder to qualify as a "slip up": Seems like the measures worked. Will we, or the NYPost ever know how the breach occurred? Probably not. Because no one on the Security side wants everyone to know what to look for, what opportunities might exist, should you wish to approach the inner circle. JMO
 
This whole issue of communication among law enforcement entities at major events and during major crises just really makes me angry. This has been discussed for years now, and it still seems like little progress has been made.

In 2007, after the Virginia Tech campus shooting that killed 33 people, task forces were formed in states across the country to address campus safety and issues that we learned from the Virginia Tech mass shooting. At the time, I was working at a university in Ohio and was appointed to represent our university on the Governor's Task Force on Campus Safety that was established immediately after the Virginia Tech incident. We had many statewide meetings, including meetings with leaders from Virginia Tech's campus security team. One of the things that came up at these meetings, over and over again, was the need for improved and coordinated communication abilities among different law enforcement agencies. That was in 2007. It is now 2024. And the SS are still having this problem? Seventeen (17) years ago the communications problem among various LE entities in crisis events was highlighted as needing to be resolved. I find it amazing that it is still a problem among SS and state LE and local LE. It should be obvious and a no-brainer that this is critical - one of the most critical issues - for law enforcement in a crisis situation that they plan for when providing protection for our presidents and other VIP leaders.

Seems there are radios out there that could be used for ss,fbi, state, and local LE that could be used during an event where they are needed.

Seems the ss, fbi have allowed their authority to keep LE below them, like their not worthy.

I can’t leave this out, the ones that were in the building their phones should be subpoenaed to see if they were using their phones.



Every time i go to a store 8-10 employees are on their phone,except the cashiers.

Jmo
 
Seems there are radios out there that could be used for ss,fbi, state, and local LE that could be used during an event where they are needed.

Seems the ss, fbi have allowed their authority to keep LE below them, like their not worthy.

I can’t leave this out, the ones that were in the building their phones should be subpoenaed to see if they were using their phones.



Every time i go to a store 8-10 employees are on their phone,except the cashiers.

Jmo
Apparently there is a system and it was named and expensive.
 
This whole issue of communication among law enforcement entities at major events and during major crises just really makes me angry. This has been discussed for years now, and it still seems like little progress has been made.

In 2007, after the Virginia Tech campus shooting that killed 33 people, task forces were formed in states across the country to address campus safety and issues that we learned from the Virginia Tech mass shooting. At the time, I was working at a university in Ohio and was appointed to represent our university on the Governor's Task Force on Campus Safety that was established immediately after the Virginia Tech incident. We had many statewide meetings, including meetings with leaders from Virginia Tech's campus security team. One of the things that came up at these meetings, over and over again, was the need for improved and coordinated communication abilities among different law enforcement agencies. That was in 2007. It is now 2024. And the SS are still having this problem? Seventeen (17) years ago the communications problem among various LE entities in crisis events was highlighted as needing to be resolved. I find it amazing that it is still a problem among SS and state LE and local LE. It should be obvious and a no-brainer that this is critical - one of the most critical issues - for law enforcement in a crisis situation that they plan for when providing protection for our presidents and other VIP leaders.

I was reading yesterday how communication was also an issue during 911. And that was in 2001. The agencies couldn't directly communicate with each other - it created issues and needed to be improved.

Not quite the same scenario, but it was spoken of in an article about the attempted assassination.
I am not sure which article I read it in, but here is one that speaks of the problem.


The tragedies of 9/11 revealed fundamental problems with communication systems used by U.S. first responders. The radios that police, fire, and paramedics relied on did not effectively operate across different agencies. Some of these issues were operational, while the majority were technical.
The release of The Final Report of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States in 2004 was a landmark moment for the future of public safety communications. The commission recommended dedicating a swath of radio spectrum for a single purpose—establishing an interoperable nationwide public safety network.

 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
153
Guests online
2,075
Total visitors
2,228

Forum statistics

Threads
601,143
Messages
18,119,356
Members
230,994
Latest member
truelove
Back
Top