wgram
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2015
- Messages
- 536
- Reaction score
- 514
would't he have to excuse himself from this case? Talk about conflict of interest.Uh oh. This certainly isn't going to play out well..
would't he have to excuse himself from this case? Talk about conflict of interest.Uh oh. This certainly isn't going to play out well..
NOT THE MAYOR
NOT LAW ENFORCEMENT
"the charge was dismissed because paperwork submitted in the case lacked a necessary
DOCTOR'S SIGNATURE, confirming DiNardo was involuntarily committed under section 302 of the state's Mental Health Procedures Act"
http://www.theintell.com/news/local...-53fb-901b-c519793fe053.html?hp=top-mainstory
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
NOT THE MAYOR
NOT LAW ENFORCEMENT
"the charge was dismissed because paperwork submitted in the case lacked a necessary
DOCTOR'S SIGNATURE, confirming DiNardo was involuntarily committed under section 302 of the state's Mental Health Procedures Act"
http://www.theintell.com/news/local...-53fb-901b-c519793fe053.html?hp=top-mainstory
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Numerous off-topic posts have been removed. This thread isnot about whether or not you agree with hunting.
Please stay on-topic.
:tyou:
NOT THE MAYOR
NOT LAW ENFORCEMENT
"the charge was dismissed because paperwork submitted in the case lacked a necessary
DOCTOR'S SIGNATURE, confirming DiNardo was involuntarily committed under section 302 of the state's Mental Health Procedures Act"
http://www.theintell.com/news/local...-53fb-901b-c519793fe053.html?hp=top-mainstory
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
More detail regarding the earlier gun charge...
"Police needed a mental-health worker from Doylestown’s Lenape Valley Foundation to testify about DiNardo’s involuntary commitment, Harran said. But the worker refused to testify, citing concerns over patients’ health privacy, Harran said, and the judge dismissed the charge."
http://www.philly.com/philly/news/c...lso-banned-from-holy-ghost-prep-20170719.html
I'm not sure that they couldn't have forced the issue. As per HHS.gov (https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-profe...close-to-law-enforcement-officials/index.html
The Privacy Rule is balanced to protect an individual’s privacy while allowing important law enforcement functions to continue. The Rule permits covered entities to disclose protected health information (PHI) to law enforcement officials, without the individual’s written authorization, under specific circumstances summarized below. For a complete understanding of the conditions and requirements for these disclosures, please review the exact regulatory text at the citations provided. Disclosures for law enforcement purposes are permitted as follows:
- To comply with a court order or court-ordered warrant, a subpoena or summons issued by a judicial officer, or a grand jury subpoena. The Rule recognizes that the legal process in obtaining a court order and the secrecy of the grand jury process provides protections for the individual’s private information (45 CFR 164.512(f)(1)(ii)(A)-(B)).
- To respond to an administrative request, such as an administrative subpoena or investigative demand or other written request from a law enforcement official. Because an administrative request may be made without judicial involvement, the Rule requires all administrative requests to include or be accompanied by a written statement that the information requested is relevant and material, specific and limited in scope, and de-identified information cannot be used (45 CFR 164.512(f)(1)(ii)(C)).
- To respond to a request for PHI for purposes of identifying or locating a suspect, fugitive, material witness or missing person; but the covered entity must limit disclosures of PHI to name and address, date and place of birth, social security number, ABO blood type and rh factor, type of injury, date and time of treatment, date and time of death, and a description of distinguishing physical characteristics. Other information related to the individual’s DNA, dental records, body fluid or tissue typing, samples, or analysis cannot be disclosed under this provision, but may be disclosed in response to a court order, warrant, or written administrative request (45 CFR 164.512(f)(2)).
More on HIPPA rules here: "Guidelines for Releasing Patient Information to Law Enforcement" (http://www.aha.org/content/00-10/guidelinesreleasinginfo.pdf)
There were so many red flags and opportunities for intervention at multiple levels (home/parents, school, police, psychiatric care)....What good are laws around mental illness and possession of guns if the process to monitor and enforce fails?
Banned from high school
Banned from college campus
30 run ins with police
Stalking girls on SM
Civil lawsuit against him for hitting someone with car
Pretty clear the story about the ATV accident causing him to go off deep end is complete B.S. and should be put to bed
So here is a article that gives two pieces of info not seen by me untill now.
It says Solebury Police chief says Dinardo was unknown to them untill July of last year when they were called to Aquetong Rd for a verbal dispute between him and his mom. Maybe 302 happened sometime after that .. possible felt threatened by him?
Next ... in May 2016, Solebury police responded to a medical emergency on that sprawling tract. Cosmo DiNardo had been injured in an ATV accident, Bellizzie said, and DiNardo believed he may have suffered a broken ankle. Police, EMS, and fire personnel responded, transporting DiNardo down a steep hill and to a hospital.
http://www.philly.com/archive/erin_...nardo-claims-did-he-kill-before-20170718.html
So in May he has ATV accident and then in July same year he is fighting with his mom on the same propety and police have to be called. No where in the polices statment does it say he sustained a head injury. Just more pieces to the puzzle.
Nothing adds up.
So does that mean that CD was not confirmed to be mentally ill?
No, it means they couldn't release the info publicly in a police report. He definitely was hospitalized, twice, but they question was whether he went voluntarily. Once the charge was more serious, connection to possible murders, they went ahead. I bet that doctor or nurse is kicking themselves that they didn't take the information that he wasrandomly firing a shotgun in the air to try to get him back in.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
I've always been told that's pretty common. Someone else preps most paperwork and sometimes it gets shifted to the "signed" pile by mistake.NOT THE MAYOR
NOT LAW ENFORCEMENT
"the charge was dismissed because paperwork submitted in the case lacked a necessary
DOCTOR'S SIGNATURE, confirming DiNardo was involuntarily committed under section 302 of the state's Mental Health Procedures Act"
http://www.theintell.com/news/local...-53fb-901b-c519793fe053.html?hp=top-mainstory
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Is everipedia.com considered MSM? And can someone else's profile be shown if it contains something re: CD?
I've always been told that's pretty common. Someone else preps most paperwork and sometimes it gets shifted to the "signed" pile by mistake.
I was once charged for a specific exam component that never happened. When I got to the bottom of it, the office admitted that they prep invoices before the visit and the doctor planned this bit, but didn't get around to it.
I wouldn't read too much into this.