Because they failed to say the victims had no clue it was a BB gun. Hence is why he was charged with ARMED robbery. They didnt even have to include the weapon he used. Armed robbery would have been sufficient.
It's like trying to imply 'oh shucks it was only a BB gun.' As if no big deal.
Or like when the MSM said Mike Bown was an unarmed teen purposefully implying he was blameless when he was actually deadly dangerous. Wilson's GJ, and the DOJ under Eric Holder both agreed he wasn't just an unarmed teen as the MSM reported ad nauseam. He tried to take the life of OW thus is the reason that both agreed OW was justified in shooting MB. And there are many other times they have done the same including the shooting in Atlanta recently by a police officer. Imo they purposefully omit important facts.
This has been a reoccurring theme with MSM reporting. I could list many instances where they have done so before, and yes, IMOO, they try diminish the seriousness of it.
The FBI data shows people have died from being shot with a BB gun. It looks exactly like a deadly handgun or long gun. Imo that is why JS used it. He knew he would instill fear just like he planned.
Jmho
Again, the article simply stated the weapon. It offered no opinion either way as to the severity of the crime based on the gun nor implied anything. <modsnip>
Last edited by a moderator: