takeittothebank
New Member
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2014
- Messages
- 667
- Reaction score
- 0
Can a ME rule determine if a drowning was not suicide? Especially after 5 weeks? If so how?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So, I guess that answers my question. No matter what LE determines, there are always going to be questions for some people.
Yes, I believe that is correct in cases like this. I personally look at the family's reaction - if they feel comfortable with the findings then what can anyone else really do? I still would like to know how Andrew Jarzyk fell into the Hudson while out on a jog after hanging out with friends...but the case was closed. No foul play was accepted. We may never know how Shane fell in and if it was truly accidental but it will be up to the family because they probably have the most information.
Can a ME rule determine if a drowning was not suicide? Especially after 5 weeks? If so how?
This is why I feel like 'accidental drowning' is a a misleading assumption and not actually what the ME determines. No witnesses, no surveillance, we don't know 100% for sure what led to the drowning. JMO. And that doesnt mean Im saying it couldnt have been an accidentNot without other factors. If the family says, my son is suicidal & he ended up in a river. Then yes.
If his wrists are slashed or an overdose of medication/drugs is indicated - they can rule in that favor.
It's up to the family to give the ME clues to cause of death. Also law enforcement plays a huge role & is in constant contact with each other
Yes, I believe that is correct in cases like this. I personally look at the family's reaction - if they feel comfortable with the findings then what can anyone else really do? I still would like to know how Andrew Jarzyk fell into the Hudson while out on a jog after hanging out with friends...but the case was closed. No foul play was accepted. We may never know how Shane fell in and if it was truly accidental but it will be up to the family because they probably have the most information.
While researching news stories during Shane's case, I came across an article that still baffles me. It was where LE and the ME disagreed on a stabbing in that same area 3 years ago. ME said homicide / LE ruled it suicide. ME ended up changing the cause of death to suicide. I often read where LE will change their decision based on the ME report...but this just sounded so odd. I have no idea what evidence was presented to get an ME to move away from his/her decision but it's a perfect example of a final decision sitting well but still having to accept it. Here is the article if interested. It's off topic but it left me wondering if the real estate value was more important...
http://patch.com/pennsylvania/roxborough/police-venice-lofts-stabbing-death-ruled-a-suicide
Shane had an older brother. I would say Shane's extended family was medium-large. I will tell you he has many many people who love him and a very good group of friends. I can't say how they are holding up through this. I have seen them be very strong through all of this. They have a church and community that love them very much.
Yes, I believe that is correct in cases like this. I personally look at the family's reaction - if they feel comfortable with the findings then what can anyone else really do? I still would like to know how Andrew Jarzyk fell into the Hudson while out on a jog after hanging out with friends...but the case was closed. No foul play was accepted. We may never know how Shane fell in and if it was truly accidental but it will be up to the family because they probably have the most information.
While researching news stories during Shane's case, I came across an article that still baffles me. It was where LE and the ME disagreed on a stabbing in that same area 3 years ago. ME said homicide / LE ruled it suicide. ME ended up changing the cause of death to suicide. I often read where LE will change their decision based on the ME report...but this just sounded so odd. I have no idea what evidence was presented to get an ME to move away from his/her decision but it's a perfect example of a final decision sitting well but still having to accept it. Here is the article if interested. It's off topic but it left me wondering if the real estate value was more important...
http://patch.com/pennsylvania/roxborough/police-venice-lofts-stabbing-death-ruled-a-suicide
http://www.philly.com/philly/news/b...ins_of_Shane_Montgomery_not_yet_released.html
ME RULES ACCIDENTAL DROWNING
The FBI never said they thought he was in the river/water. What makes you say that?
I know it can be very difficult to accept a COD, but I truly don't get this. Was Shane tossing his keys and they ended up in the water so he found it necessary to retrieve them? Did someone push him into the water? How does someone accidently drown in water they have no reason to be in? What, he decided to go for a dip on a cold November night?
PLT, people will continue to question because the conclusion in these cases, including the ridiculous suicide by stabbing case, do not make sense without any real evidence to support them. My position in the water related cases such as Majoras, Jarzyk, this one as well as missing cases of people who left bars such as Brian Shaffer and Kyle Fleishmann, is that LE takes the path of least resistance. Whether this is due to limited resources, caseload volume, pressure from family, the fact remains that for some of us, these cases are not pursued or solved to our satisfaction. This is in no way a slight to LE, as I worked closely with LE in another state for years. This is simply a commentary on the realities and limitations of justice.
http://www.philly.com/philly/news/b...ins_of_Shane_Montgomery_not_yet_released.html
Autopsy completed but results not made public yet.
That was fast
That's why the cops usually handle the media questions and not the family, but that's not what happened in this case, everything was from civilians or outside agency's and not Phila. PD. Another thing is all of the important evidence that we have been told of has been found by someone other than Phila PD. The keys and recovery of the body was all from the Garden State guys, the statement of recovery was from GS and the debit card retrieval was from KevinC after one or two failed attempts from Phila, PD to recover it. I think the debit card recovery can be explained easily though just by thinking about what KevinC told us ''he's in the business'' .
Ok, so they ruled Shane's death accidental, which does not surprise me. Among practicing Catholics, this is vitally important, since a person who commits suicide cannot have a funeral mass, and cannot be buried in consecrated ground with the rest of their family. I know this, because when I was in college, my mother's sister committed suicide and was treated to the same. I believe, without clear evidence (like a note and obvious manner of death), it's treated like an accident. I can't imagine that his family would want it ruled anything other than accidental, and that is how it will remain. My heart is breaking for this family.
PLT, people will continue to question because the conclusion in these cases, including the ridiculous suicide by stabbing case, do not make sense without any real evidence to support them. My position in the water related cases such as Majoras, Jarzyk, this one as well as missing cases of people who left bars such as Brian Shaffer and Kyle Fleishmann, is that LE takes the path of least resistance. Whether this is due to limited resources, caseload volume, pressure from family, the fact remains that for some of us, these cases are not pursued or solved to our satisfaction. This is in no way a slight to LE, as I worked closely with LE in another state for years. This is simply a commentary on the realities and limitations of justice.