Help me out here sleuthers. From the motion at
http://images.bimedia.net/documents/111510+elisa+baker+bond+redux.pdf
"b. During the evening hours of October 22, 2010 and the early morning hours of October 23, 2010 the defense team verified that certain information provided by Ms. Baker was reliable. As part of that verification the defense team located and collected a significant item of evidence".
Huh. So she wouldn't give up the goods til she had a good defense team. Then she apparently gives some info to her defense team, which team fails to notify LE and goes and gets some kind of evidence themselves. Hink-tacular! What was that evidence?
"c. On October 23, 2010, at 11:00 am., the defense team contacted the District Attorney and indicated Ms. Bakers desire to cooperate in the investigation into the disappearance of Zahra Baker. At the time of this communication the defense team informed the District Attorney that, due to weather concerns, time was of the essence in beginning the search for the remains of Zahra Baker. The defense team was told that law enforcement needed to be consulted and that the defense would be contacted when a determination was made as to how the State would proceed."
What does this imply? MSM has not to my knowledge made much of this "weather concerns" but it seems to me that it's a fairly significant piece of info. What was weather like 10/22-23 in those parts? All I can see from weatherunderground
http://www.wunderground.com/history/airport/KMRN/2010/10/24/DailyHistory.html?req_city=NA&req_state=NA&req_statename=NA indicates that there was no rain forecast. No snowstorms. Certainly no plague of rainbows. So what up with trying to urge LE on with misplaced concerns about "weather conditions"?