katydid23
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2011
- Messages
- 67,873
- Reaction score
- 238,780
If that link was correct the mother said she did not know he (accused pedophile) had access to her son's school. The way I heard it and am reading it the lady had zero knowledge about that. Maybe I am wrong?
However we do know that the mom allowed the boy to stay overnight at the home of those people. She wouldn't have to sign a permission slip for that.
What I am getting at is are we to blame the poor kid's mother? I ask this because that issue has come up in conversations I've had. In fact one in which my own mother wondered allowed why in heck the kid was allowed to stay overnight.
I say no way is this woman to blame. I feel sorry for her. The kid was an "at risk" youth. What's that encompass I am not sure, but pedophiles they smell this a mile away. They look for it. Obviously he had a handle on the poor child figuring he wouldn't tell. He got a surpise when the mom called him on it.
As he even admitted to the woman when the cops eavesdropped he did shower with her son and he wishes he was dead he still felt in control of the situation. This woman was up against allllllllllllllllllllllllllllll these wealthy whatevers and dealing with this hero of a man and still freaked.
My heart breaks for this poor young man. I have no doubt this mom is beside herself.
I am not blaming her. Not at all. I am just saying that legally, a school cannot sign a student out without the person being on a small list of authorized people. And the only way to get on the list is to have the parents sign off on it.
But that would not mean that she knew that the sick perv was actually sneaking off to the school to sign her son out of class whenever he felt like it.
I am just saying that when they took football trips they probably left early on Fridays from school---and for Sandusky to be able to pick the boy up he would have to have a signed authorization form on file with the office.