KR2tonenow
New Member
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2007
- Messages
- 3,768
- Reaction score
- 21
JVDS is the responsible party period. It was ridiculous and careless of Greta to even to suggest otherwise.
This is an excellent interview.Wasn't sure if anyone had posted this already, but it's an "exclusive" interview with Jug Twitty, Natalee's stepfather.
http://www.cbs42.com/content/localnews/story/Exclusive-interview-Jug-Twitty/Vp7af3v-ykaT6VJjG9tGxQ.cspx
From what I understand, he's been in South America since mid-May ~ which would be about 4-5 days after the attempted extortion. And the FBI is being blamed???
So she arrived at the room around 5, got killed at 8 thirty, but had her jacket on. That doesn't make sense. why would she have her jacket on inside?
You all have to admit that the timing of this "extortion" claim from Alabama is a bit tacky in light of what is really going on with the murder of Stephany, huh?
So she arrived at the room around 5, got killed at 8 thirty, but had her jacket on. That doesn't make sense. why would she have her jacket on inside?
After a few days in the Peruvian jail, he'll probably wish he had been charged and convicted for Natalee's death in Aruba. :behindbar MOOITA. If there is a vote going on about what country is at fault, I'll have to put all my money on Aruba. Joran should have been serving time for Natalie's death. Since her murder was covered up, Joran kills another young woman.
Greta Van Susteran just put this up on her Gretawire page:
Although the evidence in Peru looks bad for Joran van der Sloot, he has not been convicted of a crime. Moments ago on air I just said that if he had not gone to South America, there would not have been a murder. Of course that assumes he is the killer and that has not been established. I should have said if he had not gone to South American there would not be 'murder charges against him' in stead of saying murder. (And yes, of course, if he IS the killer, if he had not gone to South America, this young woman would be alive.)
It is fair to be suspicious of him - a woman was found dead in his hotel room...a room that he left early in the morning. There is no information available to me that she was seen again after he left the room and there is no information that anyone else was in that room...but the fact remains that he has only been charged and not convicted.
Bottom line: we need to wait for the trial.
So she arrived at the room around 5, got killed at 8 thirty, but had her jacket on. That doesn't make sense. why would she have her jacket on inside?
First of all, I am skeptical of the "8:30am" TOD. Other reports I have heard had a general time frame of when Stephany was seen entering the room, and before Joran left for the last time. As for your question ~ maybe because she didn't want to undress for him? MOOSo she arrived at the room around 5, got killed at 8 thirty, but had her jacket on. That doesn't make sense. why would she have her jacket on inside?
Hi Panthera, I'm still fighting back tears thinking about the family, so devestated and all the townspeople and friends literally in a state of shock I think.So sad to watch the video. :cry:
:rose: Rest in Peace, Stephany.
That could be very true also, but I would think it would be closer to the time of arrival than 8:30am. MOOMaybe she was attempting to leave the room when she was attacked and murdered.
Heartbreaking video of Stephany's funeral at El Comercio -- you don't need to understand Spanish to feel it...http://elcomercio.pe/
Greta Van Susteran just put this up on her Gretawire page:
Although the evidence in Peru looks bad for Joran van der Sloot, he has not been convicted of a crime. Moments ago on air I just said that if he had not gone to South America, there would not have been a murder. Of course that assumes he is the killer and that has not been established. I should have said if he had not gone to South American there would not be 'murder charges against him' in stead of saying murder. (And yes, of course, if he IS the killer, if he had not gone to South America, this young woman would be alive.)
It is fair to be suspicious of him - a woman was found dead in his hotel room...a room that he left early in the morning. There is no information available to me that she was seen again after he left the room and there is no information that anyone else was in that room...but the fact remains that he has only been charged and not convicted.
Bottom line: we need to wait for the trial.
Greta Van Susteran just put this up on her Gretawire page:
Although the evidence in Peru looks bad for Joran van der Sloot, he has not been convicted of a crime. Moments ago on air I just said that if he had not gone to South America, there would not have been a murder. Of course that assumes he is the killer and that has not been established. I should have said if he had not gone to South American there would not be 'murder charges against him' in stead of saying murder. (And yes, of course, if he IS the killer, if he had not gone to South America, this young woman would be alive.)
It is fair to be suspicious of him - a woman was found dead in his hotel room...a room that he left early in the morning. There is no information available to me that she was seen again after he left the room and there is no information that anyone else was in that room...but the fact remains that he has only been charged and not convicted.
Bottom line: we need to wait for the trial.