impatientredhead
New Member
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2008
- Messages
- 6,475
- Reaction score
- 35
I wonder why that is?
I would assume because he would have said no F'ing way.
I wonder why that is?
Yes they can, and Peru can too.
As long as he has confessed, it is all good by me regardless for his 'reason' which can never really be proved beyond a doubt anyway imo.
How sad is it that it all ended this way.It appears that Natalie's father had no clue Beth was doing this deal with Joran.
I wonder why that is?
How sad is it that it all ended this way.
To add: In his own confession, he pretty much stated that "she made him" kill her, after "she tried to escape".
He's a predator.
i think the fact that it was the anniversary of Natalies death has more to do with Stephanie's killing than Jorans "story" about her computer use, which threatened him so he took action. did you see the look on his face when he got his room key?
do you seriously believe they casually chit chated for 3 hours, and then he killed her in a fit of provoked passion and showered, dressed and calmly walked out the door in less than 30 minutes?
its aLL transparent lies, imo. the coffee trip was in support of his alibi, she was already dead, on his biggest anniversary. and not because she looked in his computer, but because she had something he wanted. her life.
It was Beth!? Wow...This is news to me....
Here's another story about missing women in Columbia, too.
http://translate.google.com/transla...&hs=Cf1&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&prmd=n
The article states there are two missing women in Columbia who were frequent visitors to casinos. They disappeared during the time he was in Bogota. While there, JVDS stayed in 2 different hotels. The police in Columbia are checking the videos of the casinos there.
I think him leaving with a dead body in the room and returning is much less likely then her being alive when he left for coffee and dead when he hightailed it out of the room to never return.
If he was going for an alibi leaving a dead girl in his room, registered in his name, with her blood all over his shirt that is still at the scene, and then trying to flee the country.... I just don't see the alibi value of the coffee run.
It has been known that it was Beth since Friday but no one was listening to the information.
Joran received $10,000.00 in cash while in Aruba, then the $15,000.00 was a wire transfer. Hence $25,000.00.
The video of LE taking inventory of VDS's belongs shows them pulling a laptop out of a case/cover, IIRC. I also hope there is a lot of damning evidence on that thing.
Interesting update...snipped from AP news (link below)
Gamarra said the case will be turned over to prosecutors who will present formal charges against Van der Sloot. The National Prison Institute will determine which prison he will be held in while awaiting trial.
Police planned to take Van der Sloot to the hotel on Tuesday to participate in a reconstruction of the events leading to Flores' slaying, Gamarra said.
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/storie...ME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2010-06-08-01-58-18
I think him leaving with a dead body in the room and returning is much less likely then her being alive when he left for coffee and dead when he hightailed it out of the room to never return.
If he was going for an alibi leaving a dead girl in his room, registered in his name, with her blood all over his shirt that is still at the scene, and then trying to flee the country.... I just don't see the alibi value of the coffee run.
Don't know if this was posted yet..
De Nederlandse advocaat van Joran van der Sloot, Bert de Rooij, zegt dat Van der Sloot mogelijk onder zware druk een valse bekentenis heeft afgelegd over de moord op Stephany Flores.
Bert de Rooij, the Dutch lawyer of Joran van der Sloot, says that Joran may have falsely confessed the murder of Stephany Flores because he was under high pressure.
De advocaat heeft de bekentenis van Joran formeel niet bevestigd gekregen, meldt hij tegen RTL. Wel weet De Rooij dat Joran van der Sloot in een telefoongesprek met zijn moeder aangegeven heeft de verhoormethoden van de Peruaanse politie te vrezen. Een huilende Joran van der Sloot zou deze methoden hebben aangeduid als barbaars.
The lawyer didn't get the confession confirmed he tells RTL News. He also tells that Joran spoke to his mother on the phone about that he feared the Peruvian interrogation techniques. A crying Joran said that those methods are barbaric.
De Rooij vertegenwoordigt Van der Sloot in deze zaak niet, omdat hij het rechtssysteem van Peru niet kent, maar hij adviseert Van der Sloot wel.
De Rooij doesn't represent Van der Sloot in this case, because he don't know the Peruvian laws, but he only gives him advice.
Source: AD.nl
Don't know if this was posted yet..
De Nederlandse advocaat van Joran van der Sloot, Bert de Rooij, zegt dat Van der Sloot mogelijk onder zware druk een valse bekentenis heeft afgelegd over de moord op Stephany Flores.
Bert de Rooij, the Dutch lawyer of Joran van der Sloot, says that Joran may have falsely confessed the murder of Stephany Flores because he was under high pressure.
De advocaat heeft de bekentenis van Joran formeel niet bevestigd gekregen, meldt hij tegen RTL. Wel weet De Rooij dat Joran van der Sloot in een telefoongesprek met zijn moeder aangegeven heeft de verhoormethoden van de Peruaanse politie te vrezen. Een huilende Joran van der Sloot zou deze methoden hebben aangeduid als barbaars.
The lawyer didn't get the confession confirmed he tells RTL News. He also tells that Joran spoke to his mother on the phone about that he feared the Peruvian interrogation techniques. A crying Joran said that those methods are barbaric.
De Rooij vertegenwoordigt Van der Sloot in deze zaak niet, omdat hij het rechtssysteem van Peru niet kent, maar hij adviseert Van der Sloot wel.
De Rooij doesn't represent Van der Sloot in this case, because he don't know the Peruvian laws, but he only gives him advice.
Source: AD.nl
Well here it comes, no surprise.