Peter Brendt
New Member
Yes, I do believe you're correct about the December time period for media involvement.
I wasn't following the current focus of the discussion (media info) with my post. (I likely had some sort of ADD moment ) I was just thinking how the knowledge of SG's 911 call changes my views on many aspects of this case.
Well, but following that thought further down the road, how would the media hype change the views and therefor later versions of testimonies from the involved persons?
Take GC as an example:
- in the night, it happens, he does the right thing. He parks the girl at the door and calls the police.
- Some months later, all media hell breaks lose because the GB4 are found. Now suddenly everybody cares also about SG, because they have to fiull pages. The amazing part is, that, aside of local journalists, there were not many of the big outlet writers actually there anymore. From that time on, the big copying started and especially some of those outlets considered here as "doubt-free sources" were only copy editors and never ever, a copy was better than the original (there exists even a mathematical prove why this is that way).
Now, back to GC. I bet, when the first reality free journalist asked him "why didn't you let her in your house", he stumbled. Of course, the reasonable answer would be "because you don't let a drugged hooker in paranoia in your house at five in the morning". But that isn't the answer, you give the media. And so, what became later the media version 1 was created. A simple human reaction.
- over the course of the next weeks and months, GC comes under pressure. There is the Scalisa outbreak and even while that one was even for most media guys too bad to touch it, it spread. And even the nicer colored version of GC's story is questioned. Not because of the obvious behavioral glitch in it, but because there were a thousand people who had other ideas, what he should have done, regardless whether any of those ideas was realistic or not. So he gets more careful in his wordings.
- long after all of that happened, he had a knee surgery and used for some days a crutch or walking stick. A million people in the Internet conclude, he is a liar, he wasn't even able to walk to the gate ... dooh. But since some minor outlets picked up on that ... well. Not happy. Makes him even more a burnt man just for opening that door that morning.
- the prime times come, for example 48 Hours. GC, a man who never was in front of a camera, nervous like hell, has to retell this story. He knows, every word will be scrutinized, twisted, reinterpreted, he just got out of that mill. But he can't tell the TV guys to go to hell, because they would just put that in the show, out of context and color him another possible suspect. So he is forced to play along. And that creates the next version.
Seriously, if GC would come again in such a situation, he will porbably think twice about calling the police or do the right thing. If he would have closed the door, ignore SG, maybe pretending to have seen nothing, there wouldn't be a million people out in the Internet trying to paint him as liar or senile. Look at his body language in the TV interview over time.