OliviaG1996
Member
- Joined
- Feb 23, 2015
- Messages
- 496
- Reaction score
- 7
No, I'm not saying the wiping is irrelevant. I was saying that your point that the cover-up was both to conceal what exactly occurred and to conceal who exactly performed it was irrelevant to my point that a 9 year old kid would have left evidence either way; evidence that his parents wouldn't have caught. That's the point. Whether the cover-up was enacted to conceal the act, the perpetrator, or both, is irrelevant to that point (that a nine year old would leave evidence that his parents wouldn't catch, considering they themselves left evidence).
Why wouldn't JR and PR catch any evidence from BR? All they had to do was wipe down the key spots of her body- her genital area and her neck. All other areas where BR's DNA could've been found would easily be explained away by the fact that they live in the same house. Her scalp wouldn't have needed to be cleaned if a blunt object was used (which probably was wiped of prints).
BR, being 9 years old, would have to have been a murderous mastermind to have not left a shred of his own evidence -- be it hair, fingerprints, DNA, fiber, etc -- while committing this crime. There's not only zero evidence that he was such a mastermind; there's zero physical evidence he was involved in this crime at all, be it the actual assault/murder or the cover-up -- that's simply fact. Now, you can believe that the R's got every single shred of microscopic evidence of BR's off the victim, while leaving copious amounts of their own microscopic evidence from their clothes -- that's your prerogative, but certainly not mine. Also, you'd also have to believe that PR is truthful when she says she went to bed that night, and re-dressed herself in the clothes she wore the night before when she awoke the next morning -- because if she was up the entire night, BR would not have been able to commit this crime.
UBM: Who believes that? I don't. From my post that you've replied to:
"We don't know that no DNA from BR was found anywhere on his sister's body. They lived in the same house as did their parents, so it's likely it wouldn't have been reported."
BBM: Why not?
It almost sounds like you're saying that the R's left evidence from themselves on purpose. Is that what you're saying?
No.