The Bloomies remain one of the insoluble mysteries of the case. The redressing is certainly a RDI touch, but which one of them did it? Were they the only non-soiled panties in her drawer? Did someone select the Wednesday bloomies in a ham-handed attempt to cover up that the size 6 Wednesday bloomies were gone? Where did they go? Why did it take years for the Ramseys to 'find' the packet with all the size-12's? If the size 12's were grabbed in haste, is it more likely a male made this error? Surely Patsy, the member of the family who bought JonBenet's underwear, would know how ludicrous the size-12's would appear on her. I remember Steve Thomas posited that perhaps they were being worn over diapers -- there was a pack sticking out of a closet door in the hall when they inspected the house. Was JonBenet back in diapers around this time? I know her toileting regressed in the last two months of her life, so it's not unreasonable to assume the diapers were in use.
AndHence,
Who knows? LHP has not commented on this aspect. Yet why would Patsy commandeer her niece's Christmas gift to hold JonBenet's diapers in place?
if the case is not BDI then some form of PDI looks like the best bet.
Assuming its PDI, PR has all night to stage the crime-scene, but forgets about the pineapple snack. Why remove her size-6 underwear, since her size-12 underwear ended up urine-stained?
Patsy redressing JonBenet in Burke's long johns and her niece's size-12's just does not fly for me, one of those items you could maybe explain away, but two, no way.
The more coherent explanation is that Burke redressed JonBenet in those items, simply because they were to hand?
From Burke's perspective they would look OK, he knew JonBenet had worn some of his clothing before, so its not something unknown.
.