well, exactly.
And hence, we can't draw any conclusions from the choices PR made (calling LE and friends & clergy) to the RDI theory that PR wrote it to explain their dead daughter on the grounds she breached the warnings on the RN -- contacting LE would result in the immediate execution of her daughter.
While I am unaware of any survey research on the matter, I bet that if you were to survey a large sample of parents (esp those who have never heard of JB to be as unbiased as possible) and ask them what they would do in a hypothetical kidnapping (what would be better would be to do scientifically speaking would be do an actual kidnapping since what people say and what people do differ) and an RN that threatens to not contact LE would agree with Elevan & PR decisions.
The choices PR made that morning do not provide any evidence for RDIST that she wrote the RN. They are entirely consistent with her innocence, and the fact she contacted friends and clergy, and stated she did not read the entire RN, is more consistent with innocence than some convoluted over-thinking RDIST theory she intended to "breach" the warning of the RN to explain a daughter that was dead all along (not really an explanation that would fool anyone).
Use that good Southern Sense of yours. If PR or JR attempted at any time to explain that the reason JB was dead was that they read the RN very carefully but breached its warning not to contact LE, so the kidnapper murdered JB, then that would be evidence to support such a theory.
Is there any RDI who finds Elevan's choices unreasonable, or indicative of guilt or suspicion? (Worth a poll IMHO)
