LambChop
Former Member
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2008
- Messages
- 21,160
- Reaction score
- 30
I think what will capture the jury's attention is the fact that KC had the child at 1pm, or after 4pm if witness is correct and SA has proof of KC being in Walmart that day and the fact that she shows up at Tony's after 5pm with no child. Calls to anyone she could have passed the child off to for babysitting purposes all go unanswered. But she shows up at Tony's on time and stays there all night. Where was her child? Who did she leave the child with? Grave wax found on the papertowel in the trash from her trunk. Dogs hitting on trunk. No direct evidence she did it right, but also no, none, nada evidence that someone else had even a remote motive to kill this child. Mommy dearest was late for a very important date.
The fact that she made the mistake of making up the nanny story and when she could not find nanny ASSUMED her child had been kidnapped big problem. Then KC says the only two people she told was JH and JL who knew ZFG personally, and they never called the police to report the crime. Neither one of them. What kind of friends are those. So why, they don't exist, that's why there was no report to the police? A lie, like her stories, every single one of them.
The fact that she made the mistake of making up the nanny story and when she could not find nanny ASSUMED her child had been kidnapped big problem. Then KC says the only two people she told was JH and JL who knew ZFG personally, and they never called the police to report the crime. Neither one of them. What kind of friends are those. So why, they don't exist, that's why there was no report to the police? A lie, like her stories, every single one of them.