Can anyone explain why the prosecution cannot bring up the big fight that supposedly occurred between ICA and CA on the night of June 15th?
I have read in another post that the Anthonys denied under oath that it occurred (when was that?) and that bringing this up now would impeach them?
Can anyone explain would that would mean for the case against ICA?
Thanks!
I have read in another post that the Anthonys denied under oath that it occurred (when was that?) and that bringing this up now would impeach them?
Can anyone explain would that would mean for the case against ICA?
Thanks!