questfortrue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2013
- Messages
- 1,005
- Reaction score
- 134
I finally re-read the AMA with Kolar, I skimmed it the first time and missed some good parts. I found this quote most interesting:
I was wondering if anyone had thoughts on this? If the cord was not staging (which I've always been iffy on anyways, its so dark & brutal) then what could it be for?
Kolar mentions that the bruise could not have been caused by the cord. That's huge! However it raises some questions for me:
If her shirt had been pulled, was this for control? If that is the case what of the cord? The cord seems to be a "control device" (perhaps a leash, remember on one pageant app PR wrote JB liked to "play kitty")
So I guess in a convoluted way I'm asking where people think this fits in.
By the way otg, I have read your theory on the BDI angle, and I thought your theory is the most cogent so far. I believe that everyone in the house had a part in her death though.
Quote from Kolar: I dont believe the strangulation with the cord was a part of staging, and its use constituted an underlying part of the motivation involved in the assault on JBR
Hi, Annapurna, Im glad you joined the discussion.
I have also puzzled over what Chief Kolar meant.
I personally havent ever accepted a mercy killing in this scenario. I know others do.
But to try to read Kolar: If it isnt an accidental strangulation, and if its not a staged strangulation as I had once upon a time thought, then it is what Kolar describes: Whoever used the noose on JB, meant to end future issues for himself or herself or for the family as a whole. So controlling the future narrative of this event is, imo, one possible explanation for the strangulation. And, if we evaluate that both JR and PR wanted nothing more than to rescue the family honor or rescue all of them, by controlling the consequences of it, it then also makes sense to look at the head strike as an explosion to control her. Stop her screaming at a molestation event, control incorrigible behavior with one of the males of the family, strike her in frustration because she stomped on a new nintendo or lego, idk. I just know that violent domestic events are frequently triggered to control what someone doesnt know how to affect in any other way. I can see the similar motivations of control impacting both the head strike and the strangulation.
These are simply some thoughts, speculative at best, to attempt an explanation of Kolars comment.