Recent Developments

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
Echols' defense team has filed the first motion/brief requesting DNA evidence.

http://wm3org.typepad.com/files/dnamotion330.pdf

The State has 10 days to reply. The defense has 5 days to reply to the State's reply. Then, it's in Judge Laser's hands. Once he rules, the State has 5 days to turn over any materials required for testing. Judge Laser has put a 90-day time limit for returning the test results.
 
Next Thursday, May 5, 2011, the West Memphis case will be covered on True Crimes with Aphrodite Jones on the ID channel (10 pm EDT).
 
I just watched the Aphrodite Jones show. She interviewed Jerry Driver, Michelle Echols, Pam Hicks (Hobbs) and John Mark Byers to name a few. The last line of the show, a narrator voice-over, was chilling, "The West Memphis Police have not made any new arrests in the case ... yet."
 
CR I'm watching it now and I like the turn it's taking. Apparently Aphrodite Jones is convinced that they are innocent.
 
Does anyone have a link to watch it?I went to bed early last night so I missed it.
 
LF,

I don't think it's available on line yet, but it will be replayed May 8th (Sunday, Mother's Day) at 2:00 pm (I'm assuming EDT) on ID. Check your local listings to be sure. Once it's available on line, I'm sure it will be posted on the blackboard (www.wm3blackboard.com). These shows usually are. Sorry you missed the premiere. It was good, and it will be just as good each time it is replayed.
 
I DVRed it and I will probably watch it again. When I watched it last night, I had just gotten home from the bar so I was a bit hazy...LOL
 
Since I last posted an update, more briefs have been filed.

These are about jury misconduct:

Echols: http://wm3org.typepad.com/files/echolsmisconductbrief.pdf

Baldwin: http://wm3org.typepad.com/files/baldwinjurybrief2.pdf

The biggest news, however, is that the State has decided to stop resisting allowing more testing.

Echols:

http://wm3org.typepad.com/files/echols_testing_state_4-8-11-1.pdf

They also decided not to fight the jury misconduct admission:

http://wm3org.typepad.com/files/ag-juror-reply.pdf

As a supporter, I'm thrilled by these developments. I sometimes wonder why the State did such a turnaround about testing, and I've decided that it's one of three reasons:

1) They believe that further testing will provide incriminating evidence.

2) They know (or highly suspect) that the WM3 are innocent and see allowing further testing as a way to save face.

3) Since the testing is being done on the defense's dime, they're willing to risk the possibility of exculpatory evidence being found.

This is part of what Lori, Damien's wife, had to say about the testing, "The judge is allowing DNA testing of a broad range of evidence. This is a very important development. In the past the State refused testing on many items, and we now have access to almost everything. To explain how significant this is, the shoe strings that tied the victims had several knots in them that were tied by the perpetrator - we are now allowed to have those knots untied to test for DNA. Also, beard hairs were found at the murder scene. We've not been allowed to test them because they would be destroyed in testing we are now testing those hairs along with many items that belonged to the victims, and things that were found at the crime scene. All of this is very exciting." (from wm3.org)

I know that one of the things the defense wanted to test was the "green vegetable matter" found in Stevie's stomach at autopsy. I'm not sure where that stands or even if the evidence is still in existence or can be tested. If I find out anything else about that, I'll let you know.

As things now stand, we are awaiting Judge Laser's ruling on the jury misconduct brief. As Lori indicated, he has already approved further DNA testing. I believe such testing is now proceeding. I will try to be more diligent about updates.
 
I truly believe these guys are innocent and if its decided that they are... I hope they work harder to find the real killer or killers.
 
Using the ruling I posted would be a motion in limine or the ruling is one? Or are you talking about something else altogether? I'm no lawyer; I just play one on TV. LOL I'll take all the help I can get.

ETA: Never mind! I see that you were just helping me with my spelling. Thanks!
 
Since I last posted an update, more briefs have been filed.

These are about jury misconduct:

Echols: http://wm3org.typepad.com/files/echolsmisconductbrief.pdf

Baldwin: http://wm3org.typepad.com/files/baldwinjurybrief2.pdf

The biggest news, however, is that the State has decided to stop resisting allowing more testing.

Echols:

http://wm3org.typepad.com/files/echols_testing_state_4-8-11-1.pdf

They also decided not to fight the jury misconduct admission:

http://wm3org.typepad.com/files/ag-juror-reply.pdf

As a supporter, I'm thrilled by these developments. I sometimes wonder why the State did such a turnaround about testing, and I've decided that it's one of three reasons:

1) They believe that further testing will provide incriminating evidence.

2) They know (or highly suspect) that the WM3 are innocent and see allowing further testing as a way to save face.

3) Since the testing is being done on the defense's dime, they're willing to risk the possibility of exculpatory evidence being found.

This is part of what Lori, Damien's wife, had to say about the testing, "The judge is allowing DNA testing of a broad range of evidence. This is a very important development. In the past the State refused testing on many items, and we now have access to almost everything. To explain how significant this is, the shoe strings that tied the victims had several knots in them that were tied by the perpetrator - we are now allowed to have those knots untied to test for DNA. Also, beard hairs were found at the murder scene. We've not been allowed to test them because they would be destroyed in testing we are now testing those hairs along with many items that belonged to the victims, and things that were found at the crime scene. All of this is very exciting." (from wm3.org)

I know that one of the things the defense wanted to test was the "green vegetable matter" found in Stevie's stomach at autopsy. I'm not sure where that stands or even if the evidence is still in existence or can be tested. If I find out anything else about that, I'll let you know.

As things now stand, we are awaiting Judge Laser's ruling on the jury misconduct brief. As Lori indicated, he has already approved further DNA testing. I believe such testing is now proceeding. I will try to be more diligent about updates.



All right!!! That is great news! That really put a smile on my face. These are a few steps in the right direction for once!
 
Using the ruling I posted would be a motion in limine or the ruling is one? Or are you talking about something else altogether? I'm no lawyer; I just play one on TV. LOL I'll take all the help I can get.

ETA: Never mind! I see that you were just helping me with my spelling. Thanks!

It's so rare that I can tell you anything you don't know, that even if it's only spelling, I couldn't pass up the chance.

I just included the definition of the term for others. I know you know what those motions are intended to accomplish.
 
That is AWESOME. :great:

I am so used to someone else already posting something here before I even see it... that it doesn't occur to me to come post it here. I just read it on the website and move on to the next thing. :innocent:

I will try to remember to check here when I check the WM3 website, to make sure the most current updates are here as well. I generally have it on my list of sites I check every 2 days or so. :seeya:

Since I last posted an update, more briefs have been filed.

These are about jury misconduct:

Echols: http://wm3org.typepad.com/files/echolsmisconductbrief.pdf

Baldwin: http://wm3org.typepad.com/files/baldwinjurybrief2.pdf

The biggest news, however, is that the State has decided to stop resisting allowing more testing.

Echols:

http://wm3org.typepad.com/files/echols_testing_state_4-8-11-1.pdf

They also decided not to fight the jury misconduct admission:

http://wm3org.typepad.com/files/ag-juror-reply.pdf

As a supporter, I'm thrilled by these developments. I sometimes wonder why the State did such a turnaround about testing, and I've decided that it's one of three reasons:

1) They believe that further testing will provide incriminating evidence.

2) They know (or highly suspect) that the WM3 are innocent and see allowing further testing as a way to save face.

3) Since the testing is being done on the defense's dime, they're willing to risk the possibility of exculpatory evidence being found.

This is part of what Lori, Damien's wife, had to say about the testing, "The judge is allowing DNA testing of a broad range of evidence. This is a very important development. In the past the State refused testing on many items, and we now have access to almost everything. To explain how significant this is, the shoe strings that tied the victims had several knots in them that were tied by the perpetrator - we are now allowed to have those knots untied to test for DNA. Also, beard hairs were found at the murder scene. We've not been allowed to test them because they would be destroyed in testing we are now testing those hairs along with many items that belonged to the victims, and things that were found at the crime scene. All of this is very exciting." (from wm3.org)

I know that one of the things the defense wanted to test was the "green vegetable matter" found in Stevie's stomach at autopsy. I'm not sure where that stands or even if the evidence is still in existence or can be tested. If I find out anything else about that, I'll let you know.

As things now stand, we are awaiting Judge Laser's ruling on the jury misconduct brief. As Lori indicated, he has already approved further DNA testing. I believe such testing is now proceeding. I will try to be more diligent about updates.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
94
Guests online
1,343
Total visitors
1,437

Forum statistics

Threads
602,174
Messages
18,136,159
Members
231,261
Latest member
birdistheword14
Back
Top