One of the most important things in a trial like this is to know your audience, the jurors. This appears to be one of KN foibles. I understand that he wants to make a point and drive home that point, but in the meantime, he appears to be losing the attention of all the jurors.
Going through emails line by line and having them interpreted by a third party and asking the witness to draw conclusions is seemingly baseless and a waste of time. The emails were based on interpretations by 3 people: Chris Hughes, Skye Hughes and Travis. The Hughes were outsiders in the relationship between JA and TA. To give these emails so much weight by Nurmi may very well backfire.
How many times have we posted on here, trying to get a POV across or render an opinion on a tweet or statement, and the delivery is misinterpreted, misunderstood, misconstrued? How cannot the same be true here? JMV