No kidding? Thought you were maybe in your 20's now. Haha. Let's see, in 1977 I was 29. My children were 7 and 9. They are now in their 40's. I do remember the song.![]()
I was 16. I still love the song.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No kidding? Thought you were maybe in your 20's now. Haha. Let's see, in 1977 I was 29. My children were 7 and 9. They are now in their 40's. I do remember the song.![]()
I have been very curious about this motion. The dates are suspicious to say the least. There was a post or a twitter saying MDLR was being investigated for something. As far as I know this is a rumor but it is something that makes you go Hmm.
Ok, something has been bugging me.
WTH did JA have TAs engagement ring for, and he seemed ok about it?
We are going off topic. Remember while this thread is relaxed on the weekend break it is still retrial only discussions. Personal discussions should move over to the Sidebar. Don't make me get my wooden spoon.
Ah...I had just returned from vacationing Mexico when this song was extremely popular. And I bet most of you weren't born yet, right?
Has anyone heard from Tuba? Wondering if all is well with her. She hasn't posted here in weeks.
Gee, I think he does. And, I think he gets to cross-examine witnesses that the DT brings forward for their surrebuttal.
IMO, JM will make sure that the difference between "disorder" and "mental illness" is made very, very clear to the jury.
Where the DT has blurred distinctions, JM will bring focus.
I really admired the exchanges Dr. D had with KLN when he would try to twist the meaning of her words by paraphrasing them, and she would say no, and reiterate her point. I wonder if the jury was as put off as I was when Dr. D had to say JA "had taken without permission" the engagement ring from Travis's drawer instead of being allowed to say that JA had "stolen" it. Which, of course, underscored the fact that while Jodi may not have had an arrest record, she clearly was involved in illegal activities like theft making that mitigator less believable.
If she's this strong so early in her career, Dr. D is going to be a force to reckon with as time goes on.
Oh, they are well aware of everything we do. Silly, corporate nosey ... oops, I mean, BEST COMPANY EVERH!
Was just over on Court Chatter reading JA's email/letter to TA dated May 16th. Can someone pls remind me of the date of the phone sex recording. And does anyone know how/where this letter was discovered? FWIW, it has HER email address in the TO: line. So strange...Have to wonder if this was a post-murder concoction like allegedly some of her journal entries were.
I am officially creeped out by the letter. IMO, it almost reads like she is hinting at suicide in her patent passive-aggressive way. Oh how I wish she had just followed thru with those threats, sigh.
He may only have appeared to be okay, not wanting to set JA off.
Speaking of evidence, perhaps it's just because I'm Canadian and therefore don't have a lot of experience with guns, but if I were on the jury, I'd like to have seen examples of just how big the weapons believed used would have been. Surely there's a range of sizes, but I don't recall seeing anything during trial that actually showed how big the gun would have been(would it have fit within her palm, been the size of her hand, etc.) as well as examples of the size of the knife it would have taken to inflict those wounds(hunting knife, one of those big chef knives, a smaller paring knife, etc.).
Many people are visual and just cannot process measurements on a piece of paper into the visual, like all the people who keep spouting about how such a small "girl" could have taken down a "man"(ie. TA wasn't the tallest man in the world, or anywhere near the heaviest and JA certainly wasn't a tiny waif, she certainly dwarfs JW.), then you add in JA's martial arts training, type of work(trays of food/drink, on her feet for hours, at least when she was busy running for those tips or after her ex bf's), etc. compared to someone who was battling his weight and basically had a desk job where the heaviest thing he commonly lifted was Naps and perhaps the trays of cookies he'd bake with his friends (not said to sound mean but TA wasn't exactly a jock).
http://www.courtchatter.com/2015/02/jodi-arias-document-placed-under-seal.html?spref=tw
There is an interesting Anonymous reader comment at this site regarding SOMETHING that happened at the Purple Plum after JA murdered TA. I searched around and found a WS post by Wenwe4 dated 4-9-2013 which summed up JM crossing LaV.
JM: You received info she was manipulative in her relationship with men shortly after the killing?
LaV: With what men?
JM: Any memory of your notes after JA to Yreka
LaV: Are you talking about her experience in the restaurant @ Purple Plum . . her interaction with men . .. indicated that she was
DT: objection - may we approach - you may
The DT successfully kept whatever this was out of the first trial; and the Purple Plum witness statement presented in this trial (through JD) was quite limited. If the commenter on Court Chatter is to be believed, the incident was NOT the Im new in town, show me around, manipulation. Anybody know what this might be?
Funny how Jodi says Travis was so abusive to her, broke her finger, blah, blah, blah and yet even when she attacked him with a knife he did not really fight back and attack her. You would think that such an abusive man as she claimed Travis was would have put up one hell of a fight and left her with with wounds.
But no, even when he was being savagely attacked, he did not go after her. That pretty much proves that he was not at all the brutal or violent abusive man that she claimed he was.
We used this image during the guilt phase of the trial.
I placed the arrow at the depth the blade would have had to have been inserted to fatally penetrate and result in the hemmorhagic injury of the superior vena cava as Dr. Horn described in his autopsy report.
View attachment 68883
They provide a good idea of the scaling about which you make inquiry.
From your link:
BBM
I've said the very same. Thank you for posting this.
The only part I'd counter is his insistence that personality disordered people experienced extreme early childhood abuse and/or neglect. Most do, but certainly not all. Some with which I'm familiar were the exact opposite - entitled, spoiled, taught they were superior to others, and never held accountable or responsible for any of their actions.
JMO
That knife sure looks like it would have been awkward given how little of the blade was inserted, would a regular hunting knife have done the same kind of damage and been strong enough to withstand chipping the bone as the evidence showed? That gun, holy batsnot! it's small, unless I knew for a fact it could kill the person I was going after, I surely would have opted for a knife first, though I think going for the jugular first would make more sense than trying to carve out their heart...
As we know, there were many incised wounds of varying depths and lengths, including this one:
View attachment 68886
He wasn't bleeding out fast enough for JA. That's why she did go for the jugular and the carotid.