Retrial for Sentencing of Jodi Arias - Day 20

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
I have a feeling the jurors are completely confused as to what the point is regarding the "mitigation". Because there is nothing sequential being presented to the jury. Nothing is straightforward. I, personally, if I was on the jury, would be very suspicious as to what was being hidden from me and would suspect Ms. Arias to be much, much worse than presented.

I also suspect Nurmi's tactics are going to backfire. Juan hasn't done any cross examination of many of the witnesses yet. So Juan's cross (which will probably be epic) will be fresh in the juror's minds while the original defense testimony will be a faded memory.
 
Jen's Trial Diaries ‏@TrialDiariesJ 42s42 seconds ago Phoenix, AZ
Jury is looking all over. Some in distance, some notes, some at Mr. Smith, some Nurmi #jodiarias #3tvarias

I honestly think JSS has forgotten just how much of the computer testimony was done without the jury being present.

The jury is like WTH? What is going on? Where did all these allegations come from?
 
Michael Kiefer ‏@michaelbkiefer 3m3 minutes ago
Smith is explaining how when things are deleted, they linger in unallocated space that can be written over. #Jodiarias

Jen's Trial Diaries ‏@TrialDiariesJ 5m5 minutes ago Phoenix, AZ
Smith is showing us the Zlob virus #jodiarias #3tvarias

BBM

Not when you delete it with Incinerator 2.3.

Right, 'SkyMeister'?
 
Wild About Trial ‏@WildAboutTrial 22s23 seconds ago
Also, not a mitigating factor Book Club Betty #jodiarias

Carolyn Sung ‏@CarolynSungCNN 37s38 seconds ago
#jodiarias seated in court wearing a black sweater. Jury finally seated this morning.

Michael Kiefer ‏@michaelbkiefer 38s39 seconds ago
Pseudonym is about to take the stand. #Jodiarias

CBS 5 News ‏@CBS5AZ 41s42 seconds ago Phoenix, AZ
And... Here comes the jury. It's about time. Judge will allow defense expert.#jodiarias

Of course!
 
even if there is *advertiser censored*, how can they prove it was Travis that went to the *advertiser censored* site ? And again, so what and who cares.
 
And refers himself "data SCIENTIST " :(

No Degree, No CV. No Name. No reason for the jurors to believe all or any of his shtick.

Self appointed title.

Sitting in a garage doesn't make you a car.
 
Steve Krafft ‏@SKrafftFox10 2m2 minutes ago
*advertiser censored* on Travis Alexander's computer was put there by humans, not some computer-generated virus, defense expert says #jodiarias

Michael Kiefer ‏@michaelbkiefer 2m2 minutes ago
Smith says the alteration to the computer could not have been caused by virus. #JodiArias

Michael Kiefer ‏@michaelbkiefer 3m3 minutes ago
Nurmi asks how to tell if the *advertiser censored* came from virus or was sought out by a user. #JodiArias
 
I am switching my hat today from invested Trial watcher to detached courtroom student... so I don't spontaneously combust.
 
I honestly think JSS has forgotten just how much of the computer testimony was done without the jury being present.

The jury is like WTH? What is going on? Where did all these allegations come from?

I honestly think JSS is becoming unhinged. Seriously. She crossed too many lines today to think she's OK, IMO.
 
You have a Ministry of the Attorney General, or am I missing a tongue-in-cheek?:thinking:

No, the position you inquire about does not exist within Arizona state government.

I was trying to cite a very rough equivalent; however, under separation of powers, the AG is a member of Executive Branch, not the Judicial.

The Supreme Court is the final authority in the Judicial Branch.
 
Carolyn Sung ‏@CarolynSungCNN 3m3 minutes ago
Witness says alterations to computer were caused by a user not by a virus. #jodiarias
 
What? That doesn't make any sense.

That's what she ruled............

"The state had an opportunity to review Mr. Smith twice this week. In reviewing my notes, the state elicited testimony from Melendez on Oct. 21, 2014 that he found no *advertiser censored* on the computer. Based on this witness (Smith) and MF, the court will allow the witness to testify".
 
Actually Nash, according to BK JSS did apologize, told the jurors not to hold the delay against either side, and said that Geffner was not available today so next witness (John Smith) will take the stand.

Isn't that a lie?
 
From WAT

WildAboutTrial @ WildAboutTrial – 1 min


We all sin. What a joke to slander someone that wanted to be better by continuously pushing the theme that he was a hypocrite. #jodiarias


AMEN !!!
 
Steve Krafft ‏@SKrafftFox10 2m2 minutes ago
*advertiser censored* on Travis Alexander's computer was put there by humans, not some computer-generated virus, defense expert says #jodiarias

Michael Kiefer ‏@michaelbkiefer 2m2 minutes ago
Smith says the alteration to the computer could not have been caused by virus. #JodiArias

Michael Kiefer ‏@michaelbkiefer 3m3 minutes ago
Nurmi asks how to tell if the *advertiser censored* came from virus or was sought out by a user. #JodiArias

Well, that's an interesting claim.

Show me a pornographic image and prove to me, beyond a reasonable doubt, that TA physically put it on his laptop.


Why is JM not objecting?
 
Jen's Trial Diaries ‏@TrialDiariesJ 2m2 minutes ago Phoenix, AZ
OK some of it's gmail to Reegan Housley (sp) #jodiarias #3tvarias
 
From WAT

WildAboutTrial @ WildAboutTrial – 1 min


Witness just referred to Travis Alexander as "The Victim."

Who wants to bet that, that won't happen again after lunch? #jodiarias




:drumroll: Nope ... and ya can bet your boots it will not happen again as CMJA will certainly see to it :gaah:
 
Why are all these witnesses from California? This guy came to AZ from California for JA. Who are all these people and who in California is connected to them to get them to testify for JA?

:waitasec:


MOO

I betya they all belong to the same cabal.
 
Well, that's an interesting claim.

Show me a pornographic image and prove to me, beyond a reasonable doubt, that TA physically put it on his laptop.


Why is JM not objecting?

because he knows he will rip this apart when (or if) it's his turn.
 
I have a legal question: can a Judge put in a good word/speak up for the side she favors when a SC reviews a motion? ex: in this case, can the Judge ask the SC to fall on the side of Ms Arias in their ruling?

No.

I'm surprised that Pseudonym doesn't have higher academic credentials.

I checked, and the guy I was thinking of does have a degree.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
95
Guests online
438
Total visitors
533

Forum statistics

Threads
608,234
Messages
18,236,637
Members
234,324
Latest member
Abc41021
Back
Top