Retrial for Sentencing of Jodi Arias - Day 20

[04009margaret]

I think Margaret meant 'elicited', not "illicited", but I still don't follow.

LOL in the dark typing here.....it's 5:51am

 

[hindsight2020]

Jen's Trial Diaries ‏@TrialDiariesJ 1m1 minute ago Phoenix, AZ
OK Nurmi brings up the computer being used while TA was deceased. Smith says the email was just refreshed it was never sent #jodiarias

Jen's Trial Diaries ‏@TrialDiariesJ 2m2 minutes ago Phoenix, AZ
OK now we have EBOK time...haha this sounds like testimony for Trekies #jodiarias

 

[5bigfish5]

Well, that's an interesting claim.

Show me a pornographic image and prove to me, beyond a reasonable doubt, that TA physically put it on his laptop.


Why is JM not objecting?

"Cause Juan is going to consume him raw and whole.

 

[Love Never Fails]

From WAT

WildAboutTrial @ WildAboutTrial – 1 min


Witness just referred to Travis Alexander as "The Victim."

Who wants to bet that, that won't happen again after lunch? #jodiarias



:drumroll: Nope ... and ya can bet your boots it will not happen again as CMJA will certainly see to it :gaah:

Juan will turn him into a prosecution witness when he has his turn. Wait and see.

 

[Hope4More]

That's what she ruled............

"The state had an opportunity to review Mr. Smith twice this week. In reviewing my notes, the state elicited testimony from Melendez on Oct. 21, 2014 that he found no *advertiser censored* on the computer. Based on this witness (Smith) and MF, the court will allow the witness to testify".

To review Mr. Smith? WTH? Is she saying JM decided not to "review" Mr. Smith ? And so, tough luck? And what does Melendez testimony have to do with it?

Again. I think JSS has lost it.

 

[dog.gone.cute]

Juan will turn him into a prosecution witness when he has his turn. Wait and see.

Yep ... :waitasec: IF Juan ever gets his turn !

 

[Nosey Parker]

Juan will turn him into a prosecution witness when he has his turn. Wait and see.

... or ashes! :furious:

 

[newsjunkie]

That's what she ruled............

"The state had an opportunity to review Mr. Smith twice this week. In reviewing my notes, the state elicited testimony from Melendez on Oct. 21, 2014 that he found no *advertiser censored* on the computer. Based on this witness (Smith) and MF, the court will allow the witness to testify".

That may be what she ruled but that doesn't answer my question really.

I'm talking about procedure. His testimony should have been allowed within the confines of the hearings. After his testimony, she should have ruled on the motions that made the hearings necessary. After that ruling, IMO then and only then should she have allowed him to testify before the jury. An attorney can correct me if I'm wrong. I'm basing my opinion on the many court cases I have watched and on common sense.

This is all kinds of upside-down bizarro world.

 

[pinkandgreenmom]

Juan will turn him into a prosecution witness when he has his turn. Wait and see.

Imagine this being your first trial (and this is what you have to work with), and then being crossed by Juan.

I haven't seen it mentioned by the tweeters but I'd be curious as to what this guy's demeanor is like. I'm not getting an ALV/Dr. F/BN blowhard type vibe.

 

[ButForFortune]

Wild About Trial ‏@WildAboutTrial 32s32 seconds ago
However, Smith does believe there is evidence of history of TA visiting *advertiser censored* sites. (#Boring #WhoCares) #jodiarias

Wild About Trial ‏@WildAboutTrial 1m1 minute ago
No evidence of *advertiser censored* media on machine according to Smith in '08 computer. #jodiarias

He "believes" it??!! Huh?!

 

[angelainwi]

Dude is gonna crap his pants

Imagine this being your first trial (and this is what you have to work with), and then being crossed by Juan.

I haven't seen it mentioned by the tweeters but I'd be curious as to what this guy's demeanor is like. I'm not getting and ALV/Dr. F/BN blowhard type.

 

[5bigfish5]

Imagine this being your first trial (and this is what you have to work with), and then being crossed by Juan.

I haven't seen it mentioned by the tweeters but I'd be curious as to what this guy's demeanor is like. I'm not getting and ALV/Dr. F/BN blowhard type.

Me either, sounds scared to death.

 

[grammieto5]

So I'm wondering, is the reason nurmi spends so much time on *advertiser censored* because that's all he knows? He only defends sex offenders, right?

 

[hindsight2020]

Michael Kiefer ‏@michaelbkiefer 58s58 seconds ago
A long discussion of what Smith can learn from the cookies on Alexander's computer. #jodiarias

 

[dog.gone.cute]

From WAT

WildAboutTrial @ WildAboutTrial – 1 min


Witness not confident, trails off at end of sentences almost waiting for objection. JM feels lack of confidence and objects. #jodiarias

 

[elementary]

Let's hope--I mean even the blind can see this shell game of DT witness "availability" is orchestrated. You would think that JSS would have figured out that these DT witnesses seem to always be available when they are giving testimony for the Defense but never available for the prosecution to question them. I say JSS should, prior to these alleged experts getting on the stand, ensure their availability for cross examination. JMO

In our dreams. It would require a real judge, not this pod person. I think she exemplifies the Peter Principle at this point; once a case really challenges her, all her weaknesses come to the fore.

 

[hindsight2020]

Jen's Trial Diaries ‏@TrialDiariesJ 31s31 seconds ago Phoenix, AZ
Noon recess until 1:30pm MST #jodiarias #3tvarias

 

[dog.gone.cute]

From WAT:

Wild About Trial @WildAboutTrial · now


Noon recess.

Wolverine will now be instructed to no longer refer to TA as The Victim over a burger.

See you at 1:30pm. #jodiarias



:hilarious: Wolverine ... lol :hilarious: !

 

[grammieto5]

Will the jury be allowed to ask this witness questions?

 

[elementary]

Well I'll give Smith credit for one thing. He knew better than to have his name associated with this ****fest. What a career wrecker before his career even starts.

So will we ever know his name? Or does someone have to leak it? Some 'expert'- so proud of his work