04009margaret
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 22, 2013
- Messages
- 1,406
- Reaction score
- 97
I think Margaret meant 'elicited', not "illicited", but I still don't follow.
LOL in the dark typing here.....it's 5:51am
I think Margaret meant 'elicited', not "illicited", but I still don't follow.
Well, that's an interesting claim.
Show me a pornographic image and prove to me, beyond a reasonable doubt, that TA physically put it on his laptop.
Why is JM not objecting?
From WAT
WildAboutTrial @ WildAboutTrial – 1 min
Witness just referred to Travis Alexander as "The Victim."
Who wants to bet that, that won't happen again after lunch? #jodiarias
:drumroll: Nope ... and ya can bet your boots it will not happen again as CMJA will certainly see to it :gaah:
That's what she ruled............
"The state had an opportunity to review Mr. Smith twice this week. In reviewing my notes, the state elicited testimony from Melendez on Oct. 21, 2014 that he found no *advertiser censored* on the computer. Based on this witness (Smith) and MF, the court will allow the witness to testify".
Juan will turn him into a prosecution witness when he has his turn. Wait and see.
Juan will turn him into a prosecution witness when he has his turn. Wait and see.
That's what she ruled............
"The state had an opportunity to review Mr. Smith twice this week. In reviewing my notes, the state elicited testimony from Melendez on Oct. 21, 2014 that he found no *advertiser censored* on the computer. Based on this witness (Smith) and MF, the court will allow the witness to testify".
Juan will turn him into a prosecution witness when he has his turn. Wait and see.
Wild About Trial ‏@WildAboutTrial 32s32 seconds ago
However, Smith does believe there is evidence of history of TA visiting *advertiser censored* sites. (#Boring #WhoCares) #jodiarias
Wild About Trial ‏@WildAboutTrial 1m1 minute ago
No evidence of *advertiser censored* media on machine according to Smith in '08 computer. #jodiarias
Imagine this being your first trial (and this is what you have to work with), and then being crossed by Juan.
I haven't seen it mentioned by the tweeters but I'd be curious as to what this guy's demeanor is like. I'm not getting and ALV/Dr. F/BN blowhard type.
Imagine this being your first trial (and this is what you have to work with), and then being crossed by Juan.
I haven't seen it mentioned by the tweeters but I'd be curious as to what this guy's demeanor is like. I'm not getting and ALV/Dr. F/BN blowhard type.
Let's hope--I mean even the blind can see this shell game of DT witness "availability" is orchestrated. You would think that JSS would have figured out that these DT witnesses seem to always be available when they are giving testimony for the Defense but never available for the prosecution to question them. I say JSS should, prior to these alleged experts getting on the stand, ensure their availability for cross examination. JMO
Well I'll give Smith credit for one thing. He knew better than to have his name associated with this ****fest. What a career wrecker before his career even starts.