In every trial I have watched, the judge insists on decorum in their courtroom. Which includes witnesses not calling the prosecuter by his/her first name, witnesses not instructing the jury what to believe, defense team sending tweets, messages, etc. to the convicted killers SM accounts. I won't even get into the unconstitutional action by Sherry and all the secrecy....but, I have been told, by Az. attornies that this judge is brilliant and fair and charming and totally "with it"....so, maybe it's an Arizona thing. Just how courtrooms are run. :dunno:
I'd just like to know if JSS had any moment of clarity while admonishing DR today, after having let all the DT's "experts"(except for "Sue", he's the only one that actually seemed to have performed in a proper courtroom manner!) talk out of turn, instruct the jury, make disparaging comments about both the deceased victim and the PT, etc etc with nary a frown, all within the last few weeks.
In fact, I wish DR had blown up and straight out said(spelled out to leave no doubt) a few things about JA that she was actually witness to(JA essentially breaking and entering TA's house, using his laptop, etc) or that TA had perhaps confided in her about JA, that JSS seems to think are too prejudicial for the jury, like the truth!