Princess of Oz
Blessed Be.
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2010
- Messages
- 280
- Reaction score
- 15
Some of her "law of attraction" perhaps?I noticed that! Gosh Jodi, poor choice!:doh:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Some of her "law of attraction" perhaps?I noticed that! Gosh Jodi, poor choice!:doh:
Exactly Garthmax, the extreme BPD is the master of triagulation. She has a documented history of this, i.e., Sky & Chris pitted against Travis, playing Abe against Travis, using Dan and Desire Freeman against Travis, etc... and I am sure there are countless examples of this throughout her life that we know nothing about.
Gus. Clancy in the restroom. Answering the door at Travis's and introducing herself as his girlfriend when she had crashed the party. Matt McCartney and the magazine codes, Darryl and the gas cans and the guy at the bar that she borrowed money from. Lisa and the slashed tires and whoredom letter.
Who knows if the real reason that Travis was not married and the reason that Mimi told him she would only go on the trip with him only as a friend wasn't because of some lies JA told to those women.
Big shout out to Ziggy for first hand accounts from the court room. And to AZL for tirelessly answering our questions.
AAAAaaaand ... (picture my best chicken-wing) ... I have another question for AZL: Before the jury was brought in today, there was discussion about the need to review juror questions directed toward She-Who-Smells-Like-A-Goddess. Since she says she won't take the stand, how will JSS handle that? {Best guesses count!}
Trial Days Jodi Arias Retrial Jurors present
10/21/14 9:30 12:15 & 1:45 - 4:30 (4 hrs)
10/22/14 9:45 12 & 1:30 4:30 (4:45h)
10/23/14 10 12 & 1:30 jury sent home (1:45h)
10/27/14 9:45 11:50 & 1:30 4:15 (4:15h)
10/28/14 9:30 12:05 & 1:30 4:00 (4:30h)
10/30/14 9:30 12:00 & 1:00 4:30 pm witness secret (3pm doors still locked) (5:30h)
11/3/14 1:30 3:30 (guessing since courtroom closed) (2h)
11/12/14 9:50 12:00 & 1:30 4:30 (4:45h)
11/13/14 10:15 11:50 & 1:00 4:00 (4h)
11/17/14 9:45 11:50 & 1:30 2:50 Emergent situation closed court end of day (3h)
11/24/14 10:00 12:00 & 1:30 4:30 (4:30h)
11/25/14 10:00 12:05 & 1:30 3:45 (3:45h)
12/2/14 9:45 12:00 & 1:30 4:15 (4:30h)
Jurors present 51:15 hrs in 8 weeks of trial
12/15/14 9:50 10:50, 11:06 11:58 & 1:32 2:58, 3:22 4:27 (4:30h) Day 15 Dr.Geffner
12/16/14 10:44 11:58 & 1:38 3:02, 3:22 4:26 (4:45h) Day 16 Dr. Geffner
12/17/14 9:43 10:39 & 10:55-12:00, 1:42 3:02, 3:23 5:16 (4:15h) (13:20 this week)
12/18/14 (9am start) 9:26 10:28 & 10:42 12:00 (Geffner) 1:15 - 2:25 & 2:40 3:40 & 3:55 4:30 (4:15h)
Jurors present 69 hrs in 9 weeks of trial (more than ¼ total hours happened this week!)
1/5/2015 9am start but jurors sent home @ 9:30 without entering
1/8/2015 9:30 11:00 & 1:45 - 4:30 Pseudonym/John Smith Computer expert (4hr)
Jurors present 4 hrs this week for total of 73 hrs in 10 weeks
1/12/15 8:30 9:30 & 10:00 10:50 & 12:40 1:00 (2:10h) Flores
1/14/15 9:05 10:30 & 1:50 1:55 min (poptart) & 2:05 2:45 Pseudo/J Smith (2:30h)
Jurors present 77:45 hrs in 11 weeks of trial
1/20/15 9:50 11:05 & 11:25 12:10 & 1:15 1:50 & 2:10 2:30 (1:40 sidebar) 4:10 4:45 Geffner (3:30h)
1/21/15 1:00 2:20 & 2:40 3:47 & 4:07 5:03 (3:30)
1/22/15 9:45 10:45 & 11:00 12:00 & 1:00 2:30 & 2:50 3:30 (jury kicked out) & 3:45 for 1 min - 3:47 (poptart jury) & 4:15 4:20 (jury out) & 4:30 4:40 (4:30h)
1/26/15 9:30 10:15 & 10:35 10:55 & 11:00 12:00 & 1:05 1:35 (2:35) & 1:50 2:25 & 2:40 3:35 & 3:45 4:30 & 4:35 -5:35 & 6:00 8:00 (8:00h)
1/27/15 2:05 2:35 & 2:40 3:15 & 3:30 4:00 (2:40h)
1/28/15 1:30 3:10 & 3:20 4:00 (2:20h)
2/2/15 10:15 12:00 & 1:30 3:05 & 3:30 - 4:10 (Bishop Parker) (4:30h)
2/3/15 10:35 12:00 & 1:35 2:30 sidebar followed by recess & 3:05 - 4:00 (Demarte) (3:30h)
*Jurors present 110:00 hrs in 14 weeks trial to date (42:00 hrs since Dec 18th)
There's no way JM wants to delay this trial for a month. He's forcing JSS to pare down the DT's litany of computer allegations to what's "essential," or risk a mistrial.
Jodi's fog is more like selective, willful, convenient 'amnesia'. This fog stands for Fear Obligation Guilt - it was coined by the author of 'Emotional Blackmail' and has become a pretty common acronym to describe the tools used by a manipulative personality to keep someone in an abusive or toxic relationship.Out of the Fog? I wonder if Jodi did or had someone saw this site ans thought fog - yeah I was in a fog.
So wait, I'm trying to catch up, did Dr D actually testify that Travis never called her a *advertiser censored*? That it was the roommate, and the murderess KNEW it was a joke???????
Gus. Clancy in the restroom. Answering the door at Travis's and introducing herself as his girlfriend when she had crashed the party. Matt McCartney and the magazine codes, Darryl and the gas cans and the guy at the bar that she borrowed money from. Lisa and the slashed tires and whoredom letter.
Who knows if the real reason that Travis was not married and the reason that Mimi told him she would only go on the trip with him only as a friend wasn't because of some lies JA told to those women.
What did she see in him? She saw a meal ticket that she felt she could manipulate into doing whatever she wanted.Just had to see what JA thinks about today.
Predictably, she remains in denial and more jealous than ever.
But mostly, she just wanted to continue trashing her victim:
View attachment 68701
I don't know! Really the testimony should be stricken, but JM clearly doesn't want that because he wants to play with it some more.I suppose the best thing to do given the parties' positions is to ignore the jury questions. Why should their questions be treated any differently than JM's questions lol?
Yup.
Extra words.
So wait, I'm trying to catch up, did Dr D actually testify that Travis never called her a *advertiser censored*? That it was the roommate, and the murderess KNEW it was a joke???????
Hmmm, well that sucks for them given how much emphasis the paidexpertsfrauds put on him saying that. Makes me wonder about the 3-hole wonder comment?
I think Juan is mostly saying, the defense doesn't NEED this report to properly be able to cross examine and rebut the computer expert. They're just looking for things to complain about. Juan had to do pretty much everything on the fly, as he learned it and he was fine. Same with Demarte. Her new report was short and had not a ton of new info in it. They know she isn't hiding anything and they don't need to re-interview her every time she submits something new. Juan didn't get a single report from their experts. It's time to put on our big boy pants and deal with it. They know Juan isn't trying to hide anything. They're just being difficult.