Retrial for Sentencing of Jodi Arias - Day 34

[ShadyLady]

My example is pretty simplified. But yes, in essence, the program has a list of objectionable sites (regularly updated from the Spy bot site online), so your poor computer knows not to go there.

As does Norton. When I scan....I see it looking for certain viruses.

 

[JSR]

Oh boohoo... sounds like Kiefer has hurt feelings.

Michael Kiefer ‏@michaelbkiefer 45s46 seconds ago
Apparently, people don't realize that reporters are supposed to talk to all sides of the story, and it is not a lapse to talk to defense.


Michael Kiefer ‏@michaelbkiefer 20s21 seconds ago
Then the trial watchers, some of whom are bloggers, took photos of me and Beth Karas talking to De La Rosa and posted them online. #stalker

Yeah but someone should point out that he DOESN'T speak to both sides. I swear Kiefer talks out of both sides of his mouth.

 

[Charterhouse]

Has this trial made anyone else really cranky?

 

[cricket49]

OMG, still about the kiddie *advertiser censored*, WTH, how many months have to be spent on this garbage, not to mention the money. How many times does it have to be proven there is nothing to connect Travis Alexander to kiddie *advertiser censored*. Who cares if he looked at Adult *advertiser censored*, Travis was not a saint, he was a normal healthy young male.

I know. We had a regional sales rep from out corporate office visit us years ago and he said when most independent companies get a computer he finds the first thing they search is "sex". Surprised me to hear this but I am not a prude. I am sure most of the males on the jury are like "who cares".

 

[Night-owl]

From WAT:

Wild About Trial @WildAboutTrial · 12s 13 seconds ago


Re: media saved to comp..

RB found 2 photos of nude females, one female almost nude, then male & female. 4 total.

Thumbnails img #jodiarias

At one time, those adults were children, and that counts as child *advertiser censored* as far as Jodi & Co. are concerned.
[emoji57]

 

[Hatfield]

Michael Kiefer ‏@michaelbkiefer · 1m1 minute ago
Then the trial watchers, some of whom are bloggers, took photos of me and Beth Karas talking to De La Rosa and posted them online. #stalker

Does anyone get the feeling that he was right in the middle or the actual cause of that recent allegation from DT?

 

[Nosey Parker]

Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ · 1m 1 minute ago
He did find adult images/thumbnails...4 of them. 1 of a man and woman, 1 woman naked- 1 with female back turned- 1 w/ person semi dresed

Will they turn out to be Arias?

 

[Truth Detector]

This was previously testified to as "Alexa", a subsidiary of Amazon.com, I believe.

http://www.alexa.com/

Not "alexia".

 

[Mindmatters]

Not *advertiser censored*. Addresses where *advertiser censored* is, so your computer knows where not to go.

Think of it in terms of magazines. You want to avoid *advertiser censored*, so you make a magazine filter. You know there is *advertiser censored* in Hustler. You add the name "Hustler" to the magazine filter. The filter knows the name. But it doesn't contain the contents of issues of Hustler.

Make sense?

Thank you very much for this Nightowl, you have done a great job of clarifying this issue for me.

 

[Hope4More]

You know, I wonder if the reason that the *advertiser censored* issue continues to be important for JM is because it is also attached to DT claims of prosecutorial misconduct thus JM is ensuring that all information pertaining to this issue is on the record to ensure absolute clarity when JA appeals to a higher court on this; the DT has afterall referenced the Milke case repeatedly. Just a thought.

Makes sense!

 

[ShadyLady]

Michael Kiefer ‏@michaelbkiefer · 1m1 minute ago
Then the trial watchers, some of whom are bloggers, took photos of me and Beth Karas talking to De La Rosa and posted them online. #stalker

Why would ANYONE want to talk to De La Rosa knowing that all she says is propaganda??? I bet the reporters don't quote her by name, so why talk with her at all? 'Defense spokesperson says Jodi is not getting fair trial, Juan is a meanie'..............duh.

 

[geevee]

Tammy Rose ‏@News20Chopper · 51s52 seconds ago
Detective Brown says if you go to a website and it has adds, those will all be listed. #JodiArias

 

[josie1986]

Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ · 40s 40 seconds ago
This website "Alexia" was accessed on 3:44am. It listed different website on there and "you *advertiser censored*" link was clicked on #jodiarias #3tvarias

 

[Truth Detector]

I would hope that Det. Brown is not testifying that TA did anything on that computer.

He can't state conclusively the identify of any individual accessing that device at any point in time without an eyewitness and/or corroborating evidence to prove the claim.

 

[Kamille]

Me thinks he doth protest too much.@michaelbkiefer it's not about you

And as someone astutely pointed out, this is what he chooses to tweet while the witness on the stand is destroying the *advertiser censored* on the computer evidence.

So obvious.

MOO

 

[geevee]

Michael Kiefer ‏@michaelbkiefer · 1m1 minute ago
Brown says that there were 166 *advertiser censored* addresses accessed out of 6,000. Many were pop-ups that refer themselves. #jodiarias

 

[josie1986]

Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ · 2m 2 minutes ago
User was on "you *advertiser censored*" for roughly 45 min #jodiarias #3tvarias

 

[dog.gone.cute]

From WAT:

Wild About Trial @WildAboutTrial · 45s 45 seconds ago


RB says some of the 160+ *advertiser censored* hits on TA comp are ads.

Not physical visits to *advertiser censored* sites. #jodiarias

 

[DebinGA]

Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ · 2m 2 minutes ago
User was on "you *advertiser censored*" for roughly 45 min #jodiarias #3tvarias

But what was the date ... for crying out loud! If it was around May 27, 2008, that supports someone here suggesting he was checking to see if JA had posted the sex tape on youporn. I can easily imagine JA telling TA she did so.

 

[Hope4More]

Correct me if I'm wrong but isn't the 27th the date that JA sent the missing email to TA? And he all of a sudden gets a computer attack?

May 26. Attack was next day. Maybe Travis was trying to make his computer more secure and fell for a virus popup.