ProfCluezo
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 26, 2024
- Messages
- 412
- Reaction score
- 3,458
Can any locals comment on the likelihood of an accidental hit and run occurring at this specific location at Mt Clear at 8am on a Sunday?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This is the opinion I have after tonight’s show (maybe, as well?), that the electronic data is indicating SM has been hit by a car (heart rate, stride length, gps etc).
SM wearing ear pods only helps this theory IMO.
I think there may be a few people who took part in the search now going over any unusual behaviour they remember from other searchers.
I haven't watched the show, but from other cases, I think the message about a damaged car would be oriented towards people who associate with someone who, suddenly on the 4th/5th of February, appeared with noticeable damage on their car, which they can't really explain.It is really not giving the public much to go on though, and a lot of people probably would not bother reporting a damaged car unless it aligned with something particular about the car, eg make/model or colour or some other identifying feature.
Maybe this is the point though, and this message about a damaged car is not meant for the public, but rather to rattle the perpetrators.
Why do you believe there was a 'script'? Show invites some 'experts' they speculate off the top of their heads. IMO, these shows are not scripted.They would have had to get permission from the police first before they aired the show as it's still an active investigation, where there are people of interest, who most likely would be watching
The police would have wanted to see the script on what was going to be discussed, as to not jeopardise the investigation and they would have been told on what not to say
I first knew anything of this case seeing Jess on the news. Without prior knowledge I assumed (for a minute) this was a daughter speaking out whose mother was either known or thought to have been abducted.A deviation from my recent posts. Just watched Sam's daughter's comments in her press conference. I am now considering if she targeted due to the business. Just Jess's comment " Mum is a very strong woman and far to determined to give up this fight".
What fight is this??????
IMO, a police investigation is about following any leads in order to find evidence. Not every lead will take you to evidence, but they must follow up on them all. They don't develop tunnel vision so that they won't bother investigating leads, because they mistakenly believe they 'know' what happened. Police don't know anything, except concrete evidence that generates proof that can be used in court to convict an offender.Damaged car is so very specific. Did they give any indication of what they think happened to the car?
Could be extra worrying if it was the relation with rumoured AVO against them.I'm catching up on the thread.
This info about a distant relative changing the tyres soon after
is...ummm...worrying???
But it might be unfortunate coincidence.
I mean, it would be so stupid to do for a perp.
So obvious.
I hope it was thoroughly checked by Police.
But, if it was a family member, then the accident and death of Samantha's dog is suspicious also IMO.
Agree Cedars.LE haven't given the make and model of a vehicle, so IMO they don't know that. So, IMO, they have no eyewitness or CCTV.
They may have evidence, or they may be speculating, that the way she was disabled was by being hit with a car. Hitting someone with a car often leaves damage. So LE asks the public to report vehicles with damage. They think: Maybe we'll be lucky, someone will report the vehicle, we'll find forensic proof of the victim on or in the vehicle, we'll have identified the perp. It's worth doing, because, in other cases, it has yielded important evidence.
What a shame that integrity of selfless people who devoted their time and energy to searches will be now looked at suspiciously.
As I said earlier, this case is a heavy burden for locals/local community.
By the way,
I remember reading that female searchers were bothered by some men who appeared in this area.
The police seem very interested in the family business, so it might have ended up in there, fixed and possibly spray-painted as wellDamaged car is so very specific. Did they give any indication of what they think happened to the car?
It's common for the perpetrator/s to get involved with searches
They can hear any gossip, see if any evidence has been picked up
And if there were rumours in the town about somebody, the fact they took the time to go out to search and stand with the community, these rumours could be dismissed
And people think, that person is just one of us, concerned for Samantha
It's a smoke screen
I think it's going to be a challenge to find the needle in a haystack of needles - a vehicle with body damage in a country town.
I say that as someone who has lived rural.
(Kangaroos just throw themselves in front of you.)
MOO
Disagree, very useful for the police I would imagineWell that show wasn't that useful
Disagree, very useful for the police I would imagineWell that show wasn't that useful