No woman should be assaulted or abused in the streets or in a home or in the bush while she's running, we all feel for that lady who was assaulted whilst you was running in the bush we are so glad that she's still alive to tell a story, normal people don't know what someone goes through in this situations for women and the attacker we can't put ourselves in their shoes the person who attacked it was obviously very ill only someone with a degree could probably tell us why he did not kill her, or rape her ,or kidnap her, and made her disappeared, or maybe one of the wildest theories out there maybe that attack planned a year ago was planed , with this disappearance in mind to this to throw detectives off the scene. Because we're so much people searching ,how come they haven't found a homeless person in the bush , where did the homeless person go someone must have known there was a homeless person in the bush or mentally disturbed person, if not ,you plan a murder you plan some type of evidence of other attacks to throw the Detectives off the scene.
There must be evidence from Ranges or people working in the forest of a homeless person
I understood from a post yesterday that the AVO was taken out against the Murphy's. Now I am confused. Is the AVO against the Murphy's or taken out by the Murphy's. Does anyone have a link that can clear this up, please?
This is a link to the paraphrased article that was published, and then later removed …..
sister or sister in laws ex ? Her ex - lover ?
I agree with the idea that "family member of sorts" most likely refers to in-laws. ie, someone in the family, but not related genetically. But why did he say it anyway? If he knows something, he shouldn't be dropping hints to the public unauthorised. And "could be involved" means nothing by itself, she "could be involved" with the Ku Klux Klan, or a bikie gang, or the local Embroiderers Guild. I could be involved with marine research, or Arctic exploration, or a drug ring. I'm not, but I could be. The possibilities are endless. I really doubt if CB knows any more than we do.
My understanding - AVO would be for a family member.
It seems that hit by a vehicle is a line of enquiry as Major Collision Investigation Unit detectives were involved in the search last Friday.
I thought this question had been raised previously - can't find it ATM.
So msn reported it , so the rumour was an DV order was taken out against 1 or both of them ..I think that in Victoria neither are called an AVO. They have ...
Family violence intervention order
Personal safety intervention order
The (now deleted) MSM segment just called it an AVO for simplicity. Because the public knows what that is. imo
And we don't even know if it is a truth, or if it is a rumour and that is why it got quickly deleted.
Intervention orders
www.mcv.vic.gov.au
www.websleuths.com
justicefamilylawyers.com.au
A bit off the subject, and probably of little value (and nothing to do with what we are speaking of
Because Charlie Bezzine doesn't know any more about the case than the rest of us and is using his previous title of detective to make it sound like he does know more.
I read this as they had taken an AVO out on a member of their extended family
I think given that the article was removed quite quickly and has not been reported anywhere else we should put it down as a rumour or even completely false and move. There's already not much info in this case we don't need to muddy that with info we can't verify
