Shutterfly
New Member
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2008
- Messages
- 2,100
- Reaction score
- 27
Okay....now something here is WRONG. Why? Well, the police in Williamston were rather quick to label LaVette's death a 'possible suicide' I assume based on the presence of prescribed medications perhaps? But let's face it....just because one has a medicine cabinet full of prescription meds, and even if say, a bottle is found on the floor...that doesn't constitute suicide without toxicology tests or without at least a preliminary autopsy. Yet LE jumped right up, right off, and labeled LaVette's death a possible/potential suicide? What's wrong with this picture? What they did was disrespectful, IMO, regardless of the fact that LaVette was a POI on A'sha's case. No charges had been filed against her and to do this exercized poor judgment on the part of LE. Now I find myself going back. LaVette's six year old daughter was taken away from her a month after A'sha's death according to the Anderson Independent Mail. And then the child was returned to her a month later. Apparently DSS found no just cause to keep her from her six year old. Hmmmmmm.
There have been a series of oddities in this case, beginning with the way LE reportedly handled A'sha's missing status from day one. What do you make of the investigative practices of a department who release to the media that A'sha's mother potentially died of an overdose, without a shred of evidence to support that? And obviously in the end, there was no proof of a suicide, because the poor woman died of congestive heart failure according to the coroner?!?!?!
WTF? :waitasec:
Is this like the report that A'sha had "no outward signs of trauma" to her body....and then later...that there were marks on her neck and signs of stragulation...but not enough to indicate that strangulation caused her death?
I don't know what to think now.
There have been a series of oddities in this case, beginning with the way LE reportedly handled A'sha's missing status from day one. What do you make of the investigative practices of a department who release to the media that A'sha's mother potentially died of an overdose, without a shred of evidence to support that? And obviously in the end, there was no proof of a suicide, because the poor woman died of congestive heart failure according to the coroner?!?!?!
WTF? :waitasec:
Is this like the report that A'sha had "no outward signs of trauma" to her body....and then later...that there were marks on her neck and signs of stragulation...but not enough to indicate that strangulation caused her death?
I don't know what to think now.