passionflower
Verified Insider
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2008
- Messages
- 28,756
- Reaction score
- 11,524
any word of when the autopsy results will be back and if they will be public?
Yep. I should have read back through the thread before posting, I am awfully liberal, but I will always support the rights of children over the rights of ahole loser parents.
I'm conservative, republican, Baptist, southern, etc...and I totally agree with you, there will never be an excuse good enough for me to say the parent couldn't help the choice they made, when an innocent baby ends up dead.
They charged her with homicide before the autopsy results were even in, doesn't that mean she must have harmed the baby before she dropped her into the water ?
Wouldn't there have been some outward signs in order for them to have charged her with that before COD was established ?
Homicide is the manner of death. We don't know the cause of death yet. Homicide isn't what she would be charged with. It would be a murder count.
ETA: I just noticed she's been charged with homicide by child abuse. I've never heard of such a charge. I've always thought homicide was the manner of death along with natural causes, accidental, suicide, and undetermined.
It's an interesting charge. Under South Carolina Code of Laws it's defined as:
SECTION 16-3-85. Homicide by child abuse; definitions; penalty; sentencing.
(A) A person is guilty of homicide by child abuse if the person:
(1) causes the death of a child under the age of eleven while committing child abuse or neglect, and the death occurs under circumstances manifesting an extreme indifference to human life; or
(2) knowingly aids and abets another person to commit child abuse or neglect, and the child abuse or neglect results in the death of a child under the age of eleven.
(B) For purposes of this section, the following definitions apply:
(1) "child abuse or neglect" means an act or omission by any person which causes harm to the child's physical health or welfare;
(2) "harm" to a child's health or welfare occurs when a person:
(a) inflicts or allows to be inflicted upon the child physical injury, including injuries sustained as a result of excessive corporal punishment;
(b) fails to supply the child with adequate food, clothing, shelter, or health care, and the failure to do so causes a physical injury or condition resulting in death; or
(c) abandons the child resulting in the child's death.
(C) Homicide by child abuse is a felony and a person who is convicted of or pleads guilty to homicide by child abuse:
(1) under subsection (A)(1) may be imprisoned for life but not less than a term of twenty years; or
(2) under subsection (A)(2) must be imprisoned for a term not exceeding twenty years nor less than ten years.
(D) In sentencing a person under this section, the judge must consider any aggravating circumstances including, but not limited to, a defendant's past pattern of child abuse or neglect of a child under the age of eleven, and any mitigating circumstances; however, a child's crying does not constitute provocation so as to be considered a mitigating circumstance.
HISTORY: 1992 Act No. 412, Section 1; 2000 Act No. 261, Section 1.
http://www.scstatehouse.gov/code/t16c003.php
So it looks like section (A)1 applies here.
true but im not wanting this to become a legit defense for this bullshottery.
It seems as though this charge may be unique to SC because when I googled it SC was the only state that popped up (I think). Thanks for posting it, MsMarple.
I agree; I've never heard of such a charge either but I think I like it. In particular I like the aggravating circumstances that can include past child abuse behavior, though I don't know if that applies here - I just like the concept. And I like that it specifically states that a child crying is not considered to be a mitigating circumstance.
If Toney is actually charged under section (A)1 then it looks like if she's convicted she could face a sentence of life or at least a minimum of 20 years. It seems like a well-defined charge as opposed to plain felony murder, although either way it's gonna be hard for her defense to explain how running into a creek with Grace and then dropping her isn't an act of extreme indifference to human life!
Homicide is the manner of death. We don't know the cause of death yet. Homicide isn't what she would be charged with. It would be a murder count.
ETA: I just noticed she's been charged with homicide by child abuse. I've never heard of such a charge. I've always thought homicide was the manner of death along with natural causes, accidental, suicide, and undetermined.
Thanks! I couldn't get it to work, either.
Sounds a bit suicidal. Or is it homicidal? Dunno.
Homicide is the manner of death. We don't know the cause of death yet. Homicide isn't what she would be charged with. It would be a murder count.
ETA: I just noticed she's been charged with homicide by child abuse. I've never heard of such a charge. I've always thought homicide was the manner of death along with natural causes, accidental, suicide, and undetermined.
I'm beginning to wonder if she was going to commit suicide with the baby in the creek/river but chickened out at the last second.
Just like when they shoot the kids and then shoot their selves in the arm cause they were trying to commit suicide.
http://wbtw.com/2016/01/07/official-autopsy-results-released-in-death-of-5-month-old-baby-grace/According to Deputy Coroner Darris G Fowler, the cause of death for Baby Grace is drowning, and is ruled a homicide. The autopsy was performed at the Medical University of South Carolina, with official results being released Thursday.