hockeymom4
New Member
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2013
- Messages
- 3,468
- Reaction score
- 5
But since when is a victim's father in charge of an investigation?
No disrespect intended but LE needs to provide the updates, not TE.
Please don't tell me my comment isn't victim friendly because it has nothing to do with that. It's the truth when it comes to the facts being uncovered within an investigation. This point has been expressed time and time again from the families of murder/missing victims - that they aren't given details of the investigation and how difficult it is to not know if anything significant has moved the case closer to finding the answers of what happened to their loved one.
I'm interested in what TE has to say, but we don't know if LE tells him everything or anything for that matter. After what his friend did, I bet they don't.
I've never witnessed this phenomenon before where people are looking outside of LE for the facts in a case. LE never considers the victim's family members as the leaders of a case. I've witnessed family members inserting themselves into a case before but not where posters are waiting for information that comes from them that will solve the case.
If TE has that information, LE won't like it if he takes it upon himself to spill whatever it is. The Tuesday interview thing makes no sense (because something has gone on too long - what does that mean anyway?).
I 100% agree with you and couldn't have said it better if I tried. I hope that LE is sitting beside him because information on this case, as all cases, needs to come from them. It very well may be SM, as many of you are so sure of, but what if it is not, and the circumstantial evidence and the finger pointing is done on tv. You can't take that back once it is done. I am so very thankful everyday, that this page has rules and we are not allowed to discuss a certain page and to sleuth on her until there is a POI.