Bringing forward my own embarrassingly tedious experiment re: post scheduling.
SC SC - Heather Elvis, 20, Myrtle Beach, 18 Dec 2013 - #10 - Page 26 - Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community
A few more questions that I have after reading most recent phone scenario discussions.
1) If a portion of the back and forth phone calls were only made to establish an alibi/distance between the M's and Heather... why would Sidney lie about speaking with Heather that night? The former implies knowledge of pings/tracking, and the latter implies complete ignorance of it, as well as of the fact that her phone activity was bound to be one of the first things investigated.
The only reason I can think of is if TM didn't tell him she was doing that, in order to "trap" him into the scheme later on.. but that lie was one of the major major red flags right away, so by doing so she would've trapped both of them.. idk man.
Unless there's some crazy parallel dimension in which SM was truly innocent (i.e., TM acting alone as retaliation/blackmail to punish and eliminate the threat of him leaving her)..? But the warrants said that SM lied about his whereabouts that night, and TM lied about
both their whereabouts, and I still don't know what that means.
2) What if the Heather-Sidney communication was actually Tammy-Sidney communication because Sidney wasn't allowed to have his own cell phone, either? That could also partially explain the "stolen business card" thing.. the # listed for Palmetto Maintenance APPEARS to be a landline from a cursory web search, and it's the same # listed on the police report for Sidney. If TM was confused as to how HE could have contacted Sidney since there was no trace of it on "their" cell phone, she would have to assume HE had called the company landline (I agree that this whole "she contacted me first" thing is somebody's lie). The phone section is left blank on all the recent warrants so I dunno. So if the "damning" phone calls were between the M's, all the way through 6 AM, maybe they had to split up to complete different "duties" after the act.
![Frown :( :(]()
One of them cleans, the other disposes. Ensuring no one can 100% turn on the other. If that's the case... have fun, lawyers!
3) (unrelated) Has the mall parking lot been added to THE map?
Would appreciate thoughts/corrections on any of the above! Sorry if it's been addressed already.