Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Salem, im curious, if you we're to open a thread in the parking lot, would it be an area to discuss FB? I saw that asked, and as one who frequents the mcstay threads I was curious as to what the rules are down there.
ETA, how the rules differ compared to here...
Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk
It is my belief that individuals could be sued for slander(spoken) or libel (written). Not the entire town, though. And it would have to be proven that whatever was written or spoken was untrue, caused a major negative impact on a life and was done with malice. Which is why the terms IMO, JMHO etc are so important. You can say anything you want if it is your opinion. 1st amendment and all that.
For example if you say "Person X is certifiably insane." Person X would have to prove that they are not certifiably insane to sue you for slander. But if you say " I think Person X is certifiably insane." that isn't slander, it is your opinion.
Are VI's allowed to share anything that might help steer us in a direction? Maybe we will hear from them
I hate to say it, but I think this is a recovery effort. If she were in a swampy area, what type of evidence would be left between the gators and hogs? I'm assuming there is a wild hog population there.
I hope there is some solid evidence that won't require the body.
Sorry so grim.
Thanks ghostwheel. What if the slander began because of a city document? Could the city be sued then? I'mjust curious and hope its okay to ask.
- If there's no timeline for the case, create one and post it, or begin one that others could add to. Find the most recent timeline, update it, and post it. If an existing timeline doesn't need updating, check to see if it's been posted within the last three pages of the most recent thread, and if not, go ahead and post it again for people new to the case to read.
Thanks ghostwheel. What if the slander began because of a city document? Could the city be sued then? I'mjust curious and hope its okay to ask.
I'm not an attorney, I just worked for one many years ago (I have worked at so many jobs, it isn't funny....). If the city document is factual, the city has no liability.Thanks ghostwheel. What if the slander began because of a city document? Could the city be sued then? I'mjust curious and hope its okay to ask.
Oddly no....as if it wasn't newsworthy...I couldn't find a follow up even mentioning the redacted info in any of the local papersHas anyone been able to find the REDACTED police report in the local MSM ? OR seen the REDACTED police report mentioned in a MSM , besides myhorrynews.com ?
It is my belief that individuals could be sued for slander(spoken) or libel (written). Not the entire town, though. And it would have to be proven that whatever was written or spoken was untrue, caused a major negative impact on a life and was done with malice. Which is why the terms IMO, JMHO etc are so important. You can say almost anything you want if it is your opinion. 1st amendment and all that.
For example if you say "Person X is certifiably insane." Person X would have to prove that they are not certifiably insane to sue you for slander. But if you say " I think Person X is certifiably insane." that isn't slander, it is your opinion.
Oh, regarding my post above, I'd like to change my opinion to two other cases, not just one. You reminded me of another case from the past that's still ongoing.
Generic question. Say the community comes up with its own poi. This poi ends up being innocent. Can this person sue the town for slander or fear/stress that was caused?