Continued
“Nautilus asked Murdaugh’s counsel for a privilege log, and no such log has been produced.”
Because Murdaugh’s “invocation of privilege has constrained Nautilus’ ability to respond to the subpoena,” Nautilus filed the complaint asking for resolution from the court.
Nautilus is also asking the court to “declare the rights and obligations of Murdaugh and Nautilus.”
https://www.fitsnews.com/2022/04/29...-feds-he-wont-cooperate-so-we-cant-cooperate/
Attached to the complaint are emails from Charleston attorney Drew Epting of Epting and Rannik to Murdaugh’s “bulldog” attorneys Dick Harpootlian and Jim Griffin.
On Jan. 12 — weeks before the federal subpoena was served on Nautilus — Epting wrote this to Harpootlian (Note: Any typos and punctuation errors in the emails below are that of the authors and not this reporter):
Dear Dick,
First of all, congratulations to you and your wife on the ambassadorship to Slovenia. What a beauty country and a rich culture. On more mundane matters, the U.S. Attorney’s office wants the file that you authorized be released to the Office of Disciplinary Counsel. I have inquired several times about it and ask that your client, Mr. Murdaugh, waive whatever, if any, privilege he may have in the materials previously provided to you. I am wearing out the patience of the U.S. Attorney’s office with my continued refrain of ‘I do not think producing the file will be a problem.’”
The next day, Harpootlian wrote back: “Let me check with Jim.”
About an hour later, Griffin wrote:
Drew
We cannot consent on behalf of Alex waive any privilege he may have pertaining to these files so that they can be used in a criminal investigation against him.
Epting responded: “Understood, and will advise USA. Will you prepare a log as many of these documents do not contain privileged material?”
Thus ends the communications included in the exhibit.