LetsSolvIt
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2021
- Messages
- 1,379
- Reaction score
- 15,369
DBM - double post
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
As your grandson was the beneficiary, the insurance proceeds would be paid directly to him. JMOWould this vary by state ? My son in law passed away and my grandson is his only heir. My SIl's life insurance policy is not considered part of the Estate and has not been included in the Wisconsin Probate process. The insurance will be paid directly to my grandson.
The Insurance Policy is payable to the Beneficiary, so If that is a person it goes directly to that person/beneficiary. An Estate is an entity, which requires other legalities.Would this vary by state ? My son in law passed away and my grandson is his only heir. My SIl's life insurance policy is not considered part of the Estate and has not been included in the Wisconsin Probate process. The insurance will be paid directly to my grandson.
Personally I think he'd be spinning the story about this being a payback aimed at Paul for the boat accident, just like he did on the 911 call and when officers first arrived on the scene the night of the murders. MOOAre we to think AM would confess or implicate himself to his friends, relatives or law partners at that meeting so soon after the murders? He was confronted by the CFO, but did he tell anyone about that so soon after that confrontation? Will this info just muddy the waters and confuse the jury??
I think I agree but sound like focus groups did not, according to Condon. I guess maybe I shouldn't waste energy on stuff like this. We won't know what THIS jury thinks until we know! Just praying there is no tampering or intimidation, or anyone who was a "plant."I'm not sure what to make of this. Is the defense team releasing this alleged focus group information because they themselves opened the door to letting this information in and and they trying to save face by claiming "Oh it's really no big deal"? From the States' perspective, it takes the facts as they are -- this is the motive that the State believes applies. Personally, I find it entirely plausible that financial and legal stresses -- i.e., the walls closing in -- could cause some people to murder. JMO.
The SlED agent said about 20 were all up at the house IIRCIirc is it not those people at that gathering that the prosecution wants to calls to testify or am I mistaken. Think it was said to be a full house.
Eta change to prosecution
Now I know I'm going to get slammed, but I think ole' Cousin Eddie is going to bring a lot to the party. He has known Alex his whole life, and we know based on the financial witnesses Alex paid him hundreds of thousands of dollars over the years. There was a relationship there beyond dispute.I'm thinking I can't wait for the "Cousin Eddie Did It" defense.
Agree -- I don't dispute the focus group findings. I'm questioning why the defense team is releasing this information. JMO.I think I agree but sound like focus groups did not, according to Condon. I guess maybe I shouldn't waste energy on stuff like this. We won't know what THIS jury thinks until we know! Just praying there is no tampering or intimidation, or anyone who was a "plant."
There were 2 conversations with multiple people one was at Moselle with about 20 present according to SLED agent Croft. After SLED had their 3rd meeting with Alex, they went to talk to Maggie's family and that is when Jim Griffin accompanied Alex.I think he mentions MMS parents? That somebody else said something about it too and her mom asking for clarification? I should take notes.
I agree. I think AM had long been contemplating the discard of PM (and his mother, MM, by default), and AM being placed on notice by his Firm on June 7 just sealed the deal. Time to act was now -- relying on the tragedy to also buy him so more time for filing the financial disclosure with Beach plaintiffs. JMOPersonally I think he'd be spinning the story about this being a payback aimed at Paul for the boat accident, just like he did on the 911 call and when officers first arrived on the scene the night of the murders. MOO
I do feel sorry for Buster and want to sympathize with his pain, but some times he makes it darn hard. Like yucking it up at that golf tournament not long after the murders, going to Vegas with Uncle John Marvin, some of the conversations that he had with his Dad (AM) scheming to get back into USC Law School on those jailhouse tapes.
Agree. I did read an article about the State having some LE witnesses to connect the dots but I can't find that article now. Otherwise it will come down to closing arguments, when the state has the chance to tie all the circumstantial evidence together.I am concerned about the State failing to connect the dots or closing the loops for a jury that cannot take notes.
And John Marvin and Buster were there and their not attorneys.3rd parties who break the privilege could be family members and any law partners who were not representing Alex at the time. Those are the people who were allegedly present with AM and his lawyer, Jim Griffin.
Both of Pauls friends who testified said with 100% certainty that is was Alex's voice on the video.He or Paul’s other friend did. I think the defense will try to make people believe they didn’t hear what they heard. What other response can they have?