I think the video placing him with Maggie and Paul at the kennels minutes before they were murdered, plus other evidence we haven't even heard yet is enough to convict him personally.
Hope autopsies are excellent because no evidence
Maggie and Paul's death halted the CFO at the law firm from looking further into their records for a few months. Alex staged a fake suicide attempt to buy more time, he was obviously desperate and grasping at straws to scheme his way out of his financial crisis. IMO, Alex knew Maggie and Paul's deaths would not get him out of his financial trouble but it could possibly pause the fiancial disclosures for the lawsuit until Maggie's estate was settled and until his father's estate was settled. That pause would also give Alex more time to try to right the books at the bank and perhaps make some sort of deal with his brothers or the law firm partners to help him make the trust accounts whole and he would resign. The CFO testified Alex's misuse of funds was overlooked if he returned the money. It's possible blaming an opiod addiction for his financial crimes would get his brother/partners on board to help ? Would the law firm's insurance cover the finanical loss caused by the actions of an attorney's opiod addiction ? Would his brothers/partners want to help him to protect the lawfirm's reputation ?
Are we to think AM would confess or implicate himself to his friends, relatives or law partners at that meeting so soon after the murders? He was confronted by the CFO, but did he tell anyone about that so soon after that confrontation? Will this info just muddy the waters and confuse the jury??
He could start his vehicle but not drive it until several minutes later
Not sure. At this time, it sounds like the prosecutor wants to know what was discussed. Perhaps it's nothing. I think that Alex said something that the prosecutor may want to use to demonstrate a financial motive for the murders.
I'm thinking I can't wait for the "Cousin Eddie Did It" defense.
I would think if there is money stashed off shore somewhere he would not put himself in the situation he is in now
I believe OP was speculating. The probate reported no life insurance (*i.e., non-probate inventory or estate named as the beneficiary) for the victims.
Thank you for the clarification, but I have a relative who, because she was a Mental Health patient, was not allowed to own a gun in NJ, so she said she moved to SC, so she could buy one and shoot whatever...
^^bbm
Pretty sure that someone at that meeting told the Prosecutor about the Meeting, and what was said.
My impression is that there is more to the story and EB can't say so right now. I know people who know people. OMO.
Probate goes through the County Court, while Life Insurance does not, as it is outside the Will, delivered directly by the Insurance Co.
